Saturday, December 17, 2011

Criminal Complaint filed against Obama

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION formally charging the following named individual with the corresponding crim
Posted By: watcher51445
Date: Saturday, 17-Dec-2011 08:54:18

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
c/o Lake Union Mail
117 East Louisa Street
Seattle 98102-3203
WASHINGTON STATE, USA
Fax: (206) 329-3448 (use cover sheet)
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD CIRCUIT
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE [sic], ) Appeal No. 08-4443
)
Plaintiff ) USDC No. 2:08-CV-04083 (RBS)
)
v. )
)
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA et al., )
)
Defendants. )
-----------------------------------)
)
United States ) VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
ex relatione ) ON INFORMATION:
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 241, 242, 371,
) 911, 912, 1341, 1343, 1962;
Applicant. ) 28 U.S.C. 1746(1); and,
___________________________________) FREV Rule 201(d).
COMES NOW the United States (“Applicant”) ex relatione Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness (hereinafter “Relator”) -- having timely applied for leave to intervene pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) -- to provide formal Notice to all interested Parties, and to demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, of this VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION formally charging the following named individual with the corresponding criminal violations enumerated infra.
Relator hereby formally charges:
Barack Hussein Obama with:
(1) commission of a felony by falsely assuming or pretending to be an Officer of the United States (Federal Government), acting as such under authority of the United States without the requisite credentials and without the requisite qualifications as expressly stated at Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (one or more counts);
(2) commission of a felony by falsely and willfully representing himself to be a citizen of the United States also known as a “federal citizen”, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 911 (one or more counts);
(3) commission of a felony by conspiring with one or more other persons to commit offenses against the United States (Federal Government), and to defraud the United States and agencies thereof, and by doing acts specifically to effect the object of the conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 (one or more counts);
(4) commission of a misdemeanor by willfully subjecting the People of the United States of America to the deprivation of their fundamental Right to a President of the United States of America who satisfies the Qualification Clause at Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, under color of laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations or customs, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one or more counts);
(5) commission of a felony by conspiring with one or more other persons not yet named herein, to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate the People of the United States of America in the free exercise and full enjoyment of their fundamental Right to a President of the United States of America who satisfies the Qualification Clause at Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, and because of their having so exercised and attempted so to exercise the same, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 (one or more counts);
(6) commission of a felony by placing in a post office, or in an authorized depository for mail, matter to be sent and delivered by the Postal Service for the purposes of executing a scheme or artifice to defraud and of obtaining money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, after having devised or intended to devise said scheme or artifice to defraud and to obtain money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (one or more counts);
(7) commission of a felony by having devised or intended to devise a scheme or artifice to defraud and to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, by transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire, radio or television communications in interstate or foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343 (one or more counts); and,
(8) commission of a felony by conspiring to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity as a direct result of committing two or more of the predicate acts itemized supra and in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act, partially codified at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq., during the preceding ten (10) calendar years, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962 (one or more counts).
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE
Accordingly, Relator hereby testifies that the two (2) documents previously incorporated in the instant case are true and correct, and both constitute material evidence establishing facts calling for the conclusion that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama was natural born in the Republic of Kenya, most probably on August 4, 1961 A.D., at Coast Provincial General Hospital in the city of Mombasa.
From these uncontested facts Relator concludes that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is not now and never was eligible to occupy the Office of President of the United States of America.
See Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended.
Further Relator sayeth naught.
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (Federal Government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).
Dated: April 13, 2010 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
__________________________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Private Attorney General
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice (cf. UCC 1-308)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (Federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):
VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
ON INFORMATION:
18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 241, 242, 371, 911, 912, 1341, 1343, 1962
28 U.S.C. 1746(1); and, FREV Rule 201(d)
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:
Clerk of Court (3x)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
21400 United States Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia 19106
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Philip J. Berg, Esquire [sic] (1x)
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill 19444-2531
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
John P. Lavelle, Jr. (1x)
Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia 19103
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Dated: April 13, 2010 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
__________________________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Private Attorney General
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice (cf. UCC 1-308)

4 comments:

deacon said...

unfortunately it appears this has been filed into the corporate I hope not please keep up with Rod Class he has the technique that gets us into the original jurisdiction

Anonymous said...

The corp. version of the goverment can put anyone from any country into the presidental seat they want. Just like walmart can. But the republic of the united states of america can only have a u.s. born president. so forget about the lawsuit and reestablish the republic.

Anonymous said...

.....part1/2.....Obama Approves Draconian Police State Law. Written Dec 16, 2011 at 02:34:28.
by Stephen Lendman, Posted here Sat, 17 Dec 2011 04:51 CST OpEd News.// On December 16, Obama's signature will head America closer to full-blown tyranny. Obama supports draconian FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act provisions. Justification given is national security and war on terror hokum. Henceforth, anyone anywhere, including US citizens, may be indefinitely held without charge or trial, based solely on suspicions, spurious allegations or none at all. No reasonable proof is needed, just suspicions that those detained pose threats. Henceforth, indefinite detentions can follow mere membership (past or present) or support for suspect organizations. Presidents now have unchecked dictatorial powers to arrest, interrogate and indefinitely detain law-abiding citizens if accused of potentially posing a threat. Constitutional, statute and interna-tional laws won't apply. Martial law will replace them if so ordered. As a result, US military personnel anywhere in the world may arrest US citizens and others, throw them in military dungeons, and hold them indefinitely outside constitutionally mandated civil protections, including habeas rights, due process,and other judicial procedures. In other words, presidents may order anyone arrested and imprisoned for life without charge or trial. Tyranny arrived in America. Abuse of power replaced rule of law protections. Even someone erroneously arrested and cleared of wrongdoing could be held indefinitely without charge, given non-civil trials, none at all, or, for foreign nationals, sent abroad to torture prison hellholes. Civil Libertarian Responses :
On December 14, an ACLU press release headlined, "White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat," saying: Obama "support(s) passage of the (FY2012) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which contains harmful provisions (to) authorize the US military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians, including American citizens, anywhere in the world." Responding, ACLU Washington Legislative Office director Laura Murphy said:
"The president should more carefully consider the consequences of allowing this bill to become law. If (he) signs this bill, it will damage both his legacy and America's reputation for upholding the rule of law." The last time Congress authorized indefinite detentions for uncharged US citizens without trial was in 1950 over Harry Truman's veto. ....(...)

Anonymous said...

...part2.......This law will deny US citizens due process and judicial fairness. It will let military forces, become law enforcers. It will make America a police state. It will abolish
constitutional freedoms besides others already lost.This "arbitrary, open-ended dictatorial White House mandate, was never subjected to even a House or Senate Committee hearing....It was rammed through by the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, without the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees invoking their con-current jurisdiction for public hearings." As president, Obama's done the impossible. He's governed worse than his fiercest critics feared, worse than Bush on domestic and foreign policies. This law furthers destroy American freedom. Obama's support and moral cowardice, assures it.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/239009-Obama-Approves-Draconian-Police-State-Law...... //http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-Approves-Draconian-P-by-Stephen-Lendman-111216-863.html
http://www.opednews.com/author/author194.html .....................
Comment by NugaBurd: Wrong! The NDAA of 1012, does not establish a police state. It establi-shes a military dictatorship. The US was already a police state. Despite police brutality and the passage of draconian laws, it was (albeit fede-ralized and militarized) police, who took people into custody. People were arres-ted, charged with a crime and had access to the (albeit corrupt) court system.Under the NDAA, one man can order the military -- not the police -- to seize people and detain them, without charge, indefinitely. People have no access to
the court system.That, by definition, is a military dictatorship. Calling it a "mere" police state verges on disinfo. Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:14 CST .............................
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/238986-US-Exit-from-Iraq-This-is-Not-a-Withdrawal-This-is-an-Act-on-a-Stage- *****
Occupy Psychopaths 1 (OWS vs. the Pathology of the 1%). You Tube, MrPinkWhiteBlack, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:00 CST An Occupy Wall Street activist explains why he thinks it is very important to spread knowledge about psychopaths and psychopathy. Find out about the important connection between psychopaths and the ruling 1%. This is not taught in schools (but should be). ....silent vid.....
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/239042-Occupy-Psychopaths-1-OWS-vs-the-Pathology-of-the-1- // http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx1i_Fzrd3o ??? 11,34min //
http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=Xx1i_Fzrd3o
Transcript: ...included, with comments.....in SOTT text. http://www.sott.net/signs/list_bestofweb /and/
http://www.sott.net/ ...for more....