Saturday, May 5, 2012

Obama - cannot handle the job

HELLO,


I am not a religous person. 

But I sincerely PRAY with all of my heart that EVERYBODY will read and ABSORB this information.

Then, read it several more times.

This article EXCITES  me. 

I felt that I was 'wondering around on the prairie'..... I could not, and CAN NOT understand why America elected this non-entity.

NOR can any Republican....

Odumbo is doing his best to destroy America.  Because he is such an UNHAPPY and UNFULFILLED person.

He is gay.... 

AND, he KNOWS that he has been bought and paid for... PURE and SIMPLE !!!!!

He has lied more than any president on record, and he has the conscience of a snake....no, a viper !!!!     

I am going to send this to every person that I know, whether or not they actually have a brain....get my drift??????, and then I will ask them to do the same.

At some point in time, and it will be sooner than later, the democrats ( little d ) are going to be the most embarrased people on THIS PLANET !!!!

They will then have the respect of....NOBODY !!!!!!!!

Please read this.

Ron 

PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO CAN READ !!!!!




What a powerful, straight forward piece.  
  As I’m sure you know, the Washington Post Newspaper has always had a reputation for being extremely liberal, so the fact that their Editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in their newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself.  Finally, the truth about our radical President’s agenda is starting to trickle through the ‘protective walls’ built by our liberal media. 




Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Government & Society 


Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.

How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present") ; and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of Americalike Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon -affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that's when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.

Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth –  it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.

But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.

When you understand that, and only when you understand that,  will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense.  It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/matt_patterson/
http://mattpattersononline.com/welcome/Home.html
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/11/11/years-from-now-historians-may-regard-the-2008-election-of-barack-obama-as-an-inscrutable-and-disturbing-phenomenon/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2011/08/18/the_affirmative_action_president_261823.html
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110925070539AAdicQM

Anonymous said...

Obama-rama is a total product of the 'Powers-that-be' school, theft, debauchery, fraud, disintegration of any 'rights' we had, full of himself, inept, spoiled and egotistical. He and his masters know he will never live in the world they are destroying for us. The PTB are rigid bloodline fanatics, somewhere he was hatched from SOME kind of 'royal' line, whether intentional or a 'sperm-of-the-moment' will o' the wisp tryst. Look at his promises. Yeah, I know, we expect them to re-cook the truth later, but transparency ? No. Legislation posted for us to read ? No. Change ? Not for the better. Who ever thought we would be LEGISLATIVELY FORCED into a contract like Obama-care ? When did 'health' and 'insurance' become Siamese twins ? When did going to see a doctor become an insurance problem ? One thing for sure, the PTB wants to rid the planet of most of us " useless eaters." Complacency on our part will likely result in 'showers' or easy bake ovens, or perhaps soylent green, wouldn't wanna waste that free protein. I am continually disappointed in humans ability to ruin another human for some benefit for themselves.
This is from BALLENTINE’S Legal Dictionary–1930, second Edition, the only known legal dictionary to define 'human being', LEGALLY.
HUMAN BEING :  See monster.
MONSTER:  A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. “  A monster   .   . hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land, albeit it be brought forth in marriage; but, although it hath deformity in any part of its body, yet if it hath human shape, it may be heir.”   2  Bl. Comm. 246.
Chew on that, and see how us 99% are viewed by the PTB !

Anonymous said...

Hey, give the man a break. Maybe he is just down on his luck right now.

Give the man another four years and he will show what he can do. He could give you chage you could be proud of as soon as he can figure out how to do that.

He might learn to stop telling us lies.

He might figure out how to get all the money back that he has waisted.

You might learn to love him in four years.

Nah, ain't going to happen. He can't learn that fast.

As for me I'm going to vote for Ron Paul.---Ken

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul seems like our best shot to change the proverbial presidential linen. The major difference between the 3 stooges and our line of presidents, is there have been many more presidents, same verbal slapstick gag act. I remember watching Shari Lewis and Lambchop, and even as a kid, I knew it was her hand in the sock-puppet. NO SUCH
'TRANSPARENCY' NOW ! frj
WHAT EVIL HAVE MEN WROUGHT,
WHAT PROFIT IN EVERY THOUGHT,
WHAT PRICE CAN THEY BE BOUGHT,
WHAT MORALITY HAVE THEY TAUGHT,
WHAT SAY THE BIBLE COME TO NAUGHT,
WHAT MANY WHO HAVE STOOD AND FOUGHT,
CARRY HIGH THE BANNER OF LOVE, LOCK THE DOOR OF HATE,
LEST WE LET THE LUCIFER INSIDE, AND LET HIM SEAL OUR FATE. frj

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul seems like our best shot to change the proverbial presidential linen. The major difference between the 3 stooges and our line of presidents, is there have been many more presidents, same verbal slapstick gag act. I remember watching Shari Lewis and Lambchop, and even as a kid, I knew it was her hand in the sock-puppet. NO SUCH
'TRANSPARENCY' NOW ! frj
WHAT EVIL HAVE MEN WROUGHT,
WHAT PROFIT IN EVERY THOUGHT,
WHAT PRICE CAN THEY BE BOUGHT,
WHAT MORALITY HAVE THEY TAUGHT,
WHAT SAY THE BIBLE COME TO NAUGHT,
WHAT MANY WHO HAVE STOOD AND FOUGHT,
CARRY HIGH THE BANNER OF LOVE, LOCK THE DOOR OF HATE,
LEST WE LET THE LUCIFER INSIDE, AND LET HIM SEAL OUR FATE. frj

Anonymous said...

It is obvious when we look at the two elections of Obama that he in no way was elected, he was selected and put in office by fraud . Our government has been overtaken by the Rothschild's the big banks and corporation that are greedy and their main goal has been to destroy the US. Republic and to put our commanders in chief in place that they have selected to control. They did this by using voting machines that have been proven to switch the votes. They do it through murder, before the primary in 2008 a few people that were key to Lhillart winning the primary were mudered one being Bill Gautney , shot in the head was to accurate delicates at the primary and Stephanie Tubbs Jones a strong Hillary supporter was to help with delegate votes a 2008 primary . She was also found dead two days before the primary. We must not allow electronic voting in our next election.