Sunday, June 17, 2012

Unwrapping Western Political Jargon: Who Is A "Conspiracy Theorist" And Who Speaks For The "International Community"?

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Unwrapping Western Political Jargon: Who Is A "Conspiracy Theorist" And Who Speaks For The "International Community"?
Posted By: DannyCahalin
Date: Sunday, 17-Jun-2012 14:07:55

From The Excavator
*******
"Only by acting in this way we can keep the Middle East from sliding into the abyss of wars and anarchy and thus stay, as it has become fashionable to say, on the right side of history. We are sure that other formulas that involve external intervention in Syria - ranging from blocking TV channels that do not satisfy someone, to increasing arms supplies to opposition groups, to airstrikes - will not bring peace either to that country or to the region as a whole. And that means that those formulas will not be justified by history." - Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, "On the Right Side of History."
The crisis in Syria has brought to the center of Western political discussion certain truths that were previously regulated to the "fringe," and subject to ridicule. Western media brainwashing of the Western world has subsided. The temperature, flow, and nature of the political waters are changing rapidly. Buried truths have resurfaced. And new lies that are told by the media are sinking quicker than in the past, when the counter-balancing alternative media was not as influential as it is today.
Waves upon waves of facts have landed on the shores of Western mainstream thought, right as the mighty wall of Western propaganda is collapsing to pieces at the bottom of the political ocean. The tsunami of truth is countering official Western narratives, not only about Syria but also about the false flag 9/11 events and the West's war on terrorism in general.
There was a time when calling Al-Qaeda the best friend of Washington was an opinion that only loony "conspiracy theorists" endorsed. These days, even the New York Times is publishing editorials that pretty much say the same thing, although in a less direct way.
The truths that Washington created Al-Qaeda, has repeatedly aided terrorists and Islamists, and sponsored the 9/11 state terrorist attacks with Tel Aviv are no longer taboo to discuss and defend. The pressure of being called a "conspiracy theorist" for stating suppressed facts and exposing government propaganda is not scaring many people anymore.
The question now is not who believes the U.S. and Israeli governments did 9/11, but who doesn't? The vast majority of the world does not take the official version of the 9/11 events seriously. They know it is a big lie.
Reality is reasserting itself in the West. The conspiracy theorists are not on the fringes of Western society, but in the CIA, the U.S. State Department, the White House, Mossad, MI6, and the propagandistic Western media. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is a conspiracy theorist for making stuff up about Russia selling new helicopters to the Syrian government.
But Clinton is not a lone conspiracy theorist. She has a lot of company in the U.S. government, which is ran by professional, full-time conspiracy theorists. A while back, the CIA changed its name from Central Intelligence Agency to Conspiracies Indoctrinating America, so it isn't surprising that conspiracy theorists run America.
In his article, "US Attempting to Trigger Full Proxy War in Syria," Tony Cartalucci writes that Clinton's conspiracy theory regarding Russian helicopters is just a small part of a systematic effort by Washington to criminalize the Syrian regime with false propaganda. Here is an excerpt from his article:
"Over the last week, the US has been outright caught lying - admittedly by Pentagon officials, regarding Russian gunships being shipped to Syria. In New York Times' "Copters in Syria May Not Be New, U.S. Officials Say," a senior defense department official admitted when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made her fraudulent claim regarding Russian weapon shipments, she "put a little spin on it to put the Russians in a difficult position."
The New York Times continued by stating, "Mrs. Clinton’s claim about the helicopters, administration officials said, is part of a calculated effort to raise the pressure on Russia to abandon President Bashar al-Assad, its main ally in the Middle East," indicative of the campaign of propaganda and lies orchestrated by the US State Department, the British Foreign Office, and Western and Gulf State news outlets around the world to demonize both the Syrian government and its extensive allies around the world, contrary to the facts on the ground."
Now that we know who the real conspiracy theorists are and what their agenda is, we must unwrap the other undefined and politically charged phrase that is constantly used by U.S. and Israeli politicians as well as the Western press: "international community."
This phrase is always deployed by the Western press in a U.S.-specific context to imply that U.S. positions on political and geopolitical questions reflect the will of the international community, while the positions of other governments are not based on the will of the international community, but rather their own self-interest.
French journalist Thierry Meyssan tore apart the claim that Washington's aims and the international community's interests are the same in his article, "Syria: What the Security Council Said." Meyssan wrote:
"The Western and Gulf media have long had the habit of using the expression “international community” to designate groups of states led by the United States to the exclusion of others. One reads with regard to Syria, for example, that “Russia and China oppose the international community” (sic)."
The will of the majority of the world's populations and states is not being represented at the United Nations. And the will of Western populations is not represented by Western governments. In the long run, this is a recipe for a political disaster.
The oligarchical and dictatorial U.S. government has a sophisticated propaganda strategy to make people believe its version of history, but, at the end of the day, it really doesn't care about the opinions of its own people, let alone the international community. Washington has the biggest guns, so its view is "to hell with public opinion." The tyrants in D.C. believe state violence is enough to maintain its ill-gotten power over the American people and the international community.
The U.S. shadow government also isn't ashamed to use weapons of mass destruction on Middle Eastern cities and kill millions of innocent people to get its way. So even if Washington's totalitarian propaganda fails to convince the world that its course in the Middle East is just, legal, and right, who cares? Might is right according to the thugs in Washington D.C.
Say what you want about the political leadership of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, but at least they didn't have the arrogance to claim that they represented the will of the international community and the whole human race. Stalin was a Christian saint compared to the Satanic and fascist mass murderers who rule Washington today. Mao was a mouse compared to the black cat in the White House, aka Barack Tse-Tung.
Santa Obama has a big kill list and he isn't checking it twice, because he wants to kill you regardless if you've been naughty or nice.
http://disquietreservations.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/unwrapping-western-political-jargon-who.html

No comments: