Wednesday, August 29, 2012

DHS Inside Source Claims Obama White House Set to Stage Major False Flag, “It’s Going Hot”


DHS Inside Source Claims Obama White House Set to Stage Major False Flag, “It’s Going Hot”

theintelhub.com
August 28, 2012


In a startling article published on the Northeast Intelligence Network, Douglas J. Hagmann is reporting that an inside source from the Department of Homeland Security has revealed to him that a false flag attack, planned by the White House, is set to go hot.
Hagmann, who in the past received widespread attention after a series of articles about DHS prepping for civil war (based on radio interviews he conducted) went ultra viral, is reporting that this same source is now claiming that elements of the Obama White House have given the go signal in regards to an upcoming attack.
“According to my well-placed source within the DHS apparatus, what amounts to a final authorization was reportedly given to DHS directly from the White House. A “go signal” if you will,” wrote Hagmann.
Hagmann then went on to directly quote the apparent well placed source with DHS itself.
“It’s going hot. The plan, or whatever specific operation that was devised, is going hot, being put into motion.
You’ve got to let people know that something is up, approval has been given, and unless somebody stops it, we’re going to have a staged event inside the U.S., and it’s being set up so that it gets real ugly real fast.”
The source then went on to speak about a Tennessee representative who sent out an email with a third hand version of the original DHS prepping for martial law article and how this could have been done on purpose to discredit the information.
“Don’t think for one second that the sudden resurrection of the information, as incorrect as it was by that state rep, was an accident, because it wasn’t.” 
“Maybe the rep was played and clueless to the original story, but the way the story was managed after the fact made you look like a fool, like a real nutcase.” 
The “DHS Insider” then explained how they originally came across this information which apparently involved a major slip up at the upper levels of homeland security.
The only reason I know about this authorization order, or approval, or whatever you want to call it, is that there was a major slip up at the very upper level of DHS, and I mean the very upper level.”
“Remember the news about sexual harassment, intimidation and all of the garbage that’s gone on between the people Napolitano brought in and promoted due to their ‘lifestyle’ preferences?
These are some sick people, mental rapists and perverts, who she’s brought in to her innermost circle. They make Caligula look like a boy scout, at least with power and sex.
Well, one of those people, close to Napolitano, was involved in a meeting where the concept and approval of a false flag was being discussed.”
{…}
“Now you should have an idea of how this slipped out. But they had a quick handle on damage control, given the circumstances behind the disclosure.
Potentially embarrassing circumstances, sexual blackmail” he added.
(You can read the whole DHS insider source article here)
While The Intel Hub obviously cannot independently confirm this information, it does line up and directly correlate with recent events, including large scale ammo purchases, as well as rhetoric in the media openly calling for a false flag to save Obama’s presidency.
In the last three years, the Federal Government, lead by the Department of Homeland Security, has purchased at least 1.4 billion rounds of ammo with at least 750 million rounds of that ammo being hollow point.
The cover used for most of the orders was that the ammo was being used for “training” purchases yet the total amount ordered is well over a billion rounds.
Couple that with bullet proof checkpoints, riot shields, and US Army plans for civil war, and a clear picture emerges.
Many different prominent advisers and corporate media publications have actually indirectly or directly called for a false flag attack to save the now failed Obama presidency.
In 2010, Mark Penn, an influential adviser to former President Bill Clinton, appeared on Chris Matthews Hardball and claimed that:
“President Clinton reconnected through Oklahoma, right? And the president right now seems removed. It wasn’t until that speech that he really clicked with the American public. Obama needs a similar” defining moment.”
Additionally, Robert Shapiro, an actual adviser to President Obama, published an op-ed in the Financial Times that included this stunning statement:
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership. He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
Although no one knows 100% when or if another false flag attack will actually take place, the fact remains that there is a startling amount of evidence that points towards an attack being directly on the table and a very real possibility.
We can only hope that as the alternative media continues to expose this horrid possibility, enough people wake up to it to make the powers that be pull the attack off the table.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

I'm not saying that a false flag will or will not happen because I'm not a "DHS Insider" but there are two things I want to bring up with regard to this article.

First, Mark Penn's comments were misconstrued in what I feel is an irresponsible manner. He was talking about how Clinton reconnected with the American people with his RESPONSE to the OK City attack -- with his speech. What Penn was implying was not, in my view, that Obama needed another OKC, but a defining moment in which he reconnected with the people like Clinton did in that circumstance. Now, this doesn't mean that OKC wasn't a false flag, because I definitely think it was...and that, based on what I know about Clinton, that he knew about it beforehand. But let's not run fast and loose with what Mark Penn said and claim it as evidence for a potential future false flag.

Second, does anyone realize how easily this article could have been written by the cabal? This is exactly what they've been doing for a long time, and they are doing in earnest right now as they try to confuse the resistance movement. Don't you see how they could themselves be putting the finishing touches on a false flag event and sowing the seeds of suspicion on Obama? I'm not an Obama supporter; I'm a Ron Paul guy. But let's use some discernment in ALL things from this moment forward, as the cabal unloads all of their weapons like a desperate Tony Montana at the end of Scarface in their last ditch attempt to hold on to power as they go down in a blaze of glory.