Sunday, October 21, 2012

New Book Proves President Obama Not a Natural-Born U.S. Citizen


New Book Proves President Obama Not a Natural-Born U.S. Citizen
“The true and historically valid definition of the term ‘natural born citizen’ disqualifies President Obama from running for re-election in the upcoming presidential elections.”

                  Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro)

According to the book, new research proves beyond any doubt what is meant by the term "natural born citizen" as it appears in the presidential eligibility clause in Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution.

San Carlos, CA (PRWEB)
October 01, 2012
Just in time for the 2012 presidential elections, author Bob Gard has released an eBook that sheds light on a controversy that, over the last few years, has become a grim contest of political wills. The book offers a historically verified definition of the term "natural born citizen" as it appears in the presidential eligibility clause in Section 1 of Article II of the Constitution.
With the ponderous but eminently searchable title of "On Gard, Obama, You Are An Unconstitutional President Because You Are Not A Natural-Born Citizen, Which I Shall Prove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt”, this 1,722-page volume lays out conclusive, verbatim evidence that the reader can analyze independently of the writer's own opinions.
Available at Amazon.com, the eBook can be downloaded on PCs in the Microsoft Word™ 2010 “docx” file format. The 175-megabyte file requires a longer-than-average downloading time, and some readers may experience intermittent warnings of “not responding.” Author Bob Gard says, "The wait will be worth it for those who wish to follow a path back to constitutionality."
Bob Gard is the first person who pieces together this comprehensive definition of natural-born citizenship using both correlative and corroborative evidence. For more than 220 years, much of this evidence has been readily available within the public domain, but no one has yet brought the parts together into a conclusive whole. In order to define natural-born citizenship, this book traces how the law of nature, the law of nations, the British legal system and the American legal system have evolved through the course of history. "The evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Hussein Obama's claim to presidential office is unconstitutional due to his violation of the Constitution’s presidential eligibility clause," Gard says.
The pieces of this puzzle are drawn from five centuries of books and documents that cost the author over $30,000 to acquire, as well as citations from a myriad of archives in libraries around the world.
This book's size results from numerous extended quotations and images that establish the provenance of the documents in question. Compelled by an imperative desire for readers to draw their own conclusions, the author has risked alienating many who would be put off by such a lengthy work. "In a time where revisionist spin doctors truncate documents, cite quotes out of context, and simply rewrite history as they see fit, I wanted to remain as true to the research as possible," Gard says. "Those who read this book will rapidly understand the necessity of including so many links in the chain of evidence."
According to the book, the true and historically valid definition of the term "natural born citizen" disqualifies President Obama from running for reelection in the upcoming presidential elections.

Bob Gard

650-400-3498



5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The only problem with the "natural born" citizen thingy is that since the Fraudster-in-Chief has produced so many faux birth certificates and told so many lies, we really don't know who his REAL father is. Is it the Kenyan, which would make BHO a British subject, or is it Frank Marshall Davis who was a US citizen and would make BHO a natural born citizen? No matter, though. BHO has committed FRAUD on a grand scale anyway we look at it and last I knew, fraud was still a crime!!!

Anonymous said...

Who gives a damn where he was born? He could have been born on Mars as far as that matters because the constitution doesn't apply to the corporation. What most people call: "The United States of America," isn't a country; it's a corporation that operates outside of any constitutional authority, at all. So birth certificates, tax returns be damned; they don't matter.

Anonymous said...

You are so right about the U.S. Corporation, the CEO's can be removed and they can install anybody the handlers want, they do not have to answer to "WE the People" in anyway shape or form. That is why heZ(odummer) has this aggorant, passive attitude all the time, he has to answer to Valerie Jarrett, 1st and who knows stands behind her...but they aren't Americans.
Hopefully that is ALL about to CHANGE - as all good things (for the evil ones) eventually come to an end.

Anonymous said...

Where do you get this idea they (the corporation) don't have to answer to the people? They are guilty of FRAUD, TREASON AND NUMEROUS OTHER CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. It's no wonder the criminals have taken over this nation and are still in DC living the good life with attitudes like that! You mean if someone set up a bogus corporation in your living room and pretended to be running your household you would have no recourse?

Witch said...

Bob Gard is an unfortunate example that volume cannot redeem a premise which is fundamentally flawed. His 1722 page book is worthless, not because it isn't long enough, but because the flaws of his premise begin on page one. No matter how many pages he adds, the flaw persists. You cannot fix a poisoned well by dumping more water in it.

I am not an expert on Constitutional law, and so I must defer to expertise. Considering that Bob Gard, for all his volume, has not been published or reviewed in any reputable legal journal, has not been peer reviewed, has not been cited by any recognized expert, and cannot even manage to sell his book in any significant volume, leads me to believe, and rightly so apparently, that no real expert on the subject regards his speculative pulp to be worthy of consideration.

His flawed premise also goes against every recognized authority on the subject. Indeed he contradicts even the research branch of the Library of Congress, the entity upon which the legislative branch of our government does rely for accurate and timely information on such subjects.

This combined with the lack of any apparent credentials of his own (at least that I can find and verify) leads any reasonable person to conclude that Mr. Gard is simply another obsessed birther with too much time on his hands, and with a much greater belief in his own "expertise" than his spurious book warrants, despite it's volume.

In short, Bob Gard's writings are an excellent example of how wasted space is no less wasted, no matter how much you increase the volume.