Tuesday, April 9, 2013

UK Man Wins Historic Court Case Against BBC's Cover-Up of 9/11 Evidence


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

UK Man Wins Historic Court Case Against BBC's Cover-Up of 9/11 Evidence
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 9-Apr-2013 09:32:35

.
UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast
Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

WOW someone with balls

Anonymous said...

Oh good God! Incredible. Thanks for letting us know ... wow. Well done, Mr Rooke, for making such an effort. That was a David and Goliath trial, one man against an establishment institition, and David won! And thank you to the judge for not being bribed, blackmailed or anything else!

And the implications for the Truth Movement (that's us) are ... ? I'm not sure exactly what yet, but something!