Maryland
Judge Opens “Legal” Door to Investigate Obama’s Fraudulent Social Security
Number
Judge Makes Order To Investigate Obama’s Social Security Number
It took years for Watergate to unravel fully. The controversy over Barack Hussein Obama and his past, along with fraudulent documents continues to make headlines. Yet, the items needed to actually verify who Obama is continue to be kept from the public eye. Well, that all may be about to change. Attorney Orly Taitz may have just found a chink in the federal government’s armor in protecting Barack Obama from scrutiny, following a judge’s ruling over her Freedom of Information Act request from the Social Security Administration.
Taitz has claimed that Obama uses the Social Security number of Harry Bounel and has submitted several Freedom of Information Act requests for the information from the Social Security Administration. Each time, she has been met with stonewalling by the Social Security Administration.
However, Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander has ruled to give Taitz “an opportunity to
From Taitz’s Press Release:
Judge Hollander in
Additionally, there is an increased tampering with the web site of Orly Taitz and with her ability to send mass -emails. It seems her private server is somehow affected and Taitz is unable to send mass e-mails on two different programs.
It’s interesting that Taitz points out that she will be “careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” indicating that she believes that both Andrew Breitbart and Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were targeted by Obama for assassination.” Breitbart died on the very day that he said he would begin vetting Obama for the 2012 elections, which raised suspicions. Fuddy, best remembered as being instrumental in issuing the
Taitz alleged that Mr. Bounel was born in 1890, and therefore, under the “’120 Year Rule’ implemented by the SSA in 2010,” pertaining to “‘extremely aged individuals,’” Bounel’s “Social Security applications have to be released under FOIA without proof of [his] death . . . .”
The reason for the judge’s amendment seems to be a procedural one. Taitz filed suit with the court prior to receiving word back from her Freedom of Information Act request, which she did receive on July 29, 2013 from Dawn S. Wiggins, a Fredom of Information Officer. Wiggins replied to Taitz:
I have enclosed a copy of the SS-5s for Mr. Tsarnaev and Ms. Dunham. . . .
We were unable to find any information for Mr. Bounel based on the information you provided to us. Mr. Bounel may not have applied for a Social Security number (SSN) or may have given different information on the application for a number.
It appears that once the amendment is submitted, this may force the Social Security Administration to explain exactly what is going on with Barack Obama’s Social Security number.
We should know something about the case by the second week in January 2014.
It is within the above backdrop/prism that the mysterious death of Loretta Fuddy (
One also has to wonder: why precisely wasn’t the above preliminary decision (whatever the court finally decides, to hear the fraud case or not…truth be told, the judge will have her arms twisted…only the form it takes is anyone’s guess) SPLASHED all over the media’s airwaves? Don’t waste time thinking over this conundrum…what a head scratcher!
With these trails firmly in mind, the CRIME/HEIST OF THE CENTURY becomes Obama’s FORGED documents via his red/green accomplices, leading to an IMPERIAL Presidency!
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. S
a
i
To
To
Tak
R
T
A
Hav
I
"I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; THAT I WILL BEAR TRUE FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE SAME; AND THAT I WILL OBEY THE (CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAWFUL) ORDERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE (CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAWFUL) ORDERS OF THE OFFICERS APPOINTED OVER ME, ACCORDING TO REGULATIONS AND THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. SO HELP ME GOD."
Al l l aw s w h ic h ar e r e p ug n an t t o t h e Con st it ut ion ar e n ul l an d
void." Mar b ur y
vs. Madison r an c h )
137, 164, 176. (1803)
"Wh e r e r ig h t s se c ur e d b y t h e Con st it ut ion ar e in vol ve d, t h e r e c an b e n o r ul e m akin g or l e g isl at ion w h ic h w oul d ab r og at e t h e m ."
Mir an da
vs. Ar izon a , 384 U.S.
"An un c on st it ut ion al ac t is
n ot l aw ; it c on fe r s n o r ig h t s;
it im p ose s n o
dut ie s;
it
affor ds n o p r ot e c t ion ; it c r e at e s n o
offic e ; it is
in l e g al c on t e m p l at ion ,
as in op e r at ive as
t h oug h it h ad n e ve r b e e n p asse d."
Nor t on
vs. Sh e l b y Coun t y , 118 US
Te ddy' s
An sw e r
t o
Dive r sit y!
Th e r e is
n o r oom in t h is c oun t r y
for h yp h e n at e d Am e r ic an ism . Th e on e ab sol ut e l y c e r t ain w ay
of b r in g in g t h is n at ion t o r uin ,
of p r e ve n t in g al l p ossib il it y
of it s c on t in uin g t o b e a n at ion at al l , w oul d b e t o p e r m it it t o b e c om e a t an g l e of
squab b l in g n at ion al it ie s.
— Th e odor e
Roose ve l t , sp e e c h b e for e t h e Kn ig h t s
of Col um b us, 1915 , Ne w
Yor k
T
— T
Te ddy' s
An sw e r
t o
Bush !
To
an n oun c e t h at t h e r e m ust b e n o c r it ic ism of
t h e p r e side n t , or t h at w e ar e t o st an d b y t h e p r e side n t r ig h t or w r on g ,
is n ot on l y un p at r iot ic an d se r vil e , b ut is
m or al l y t r e ason ab l e t o t h e Am e r ic an p ub l ic .
— Th e odor e
Roose ve l t
— T
Te ddy' s
An sw e r
t o
Bush
& Con g r e ss
"We c an n ot affor d t o diffe r on t h e que st ion of h on e st y if w e e xp e c t our r e p ub l ic p e r m an e n t l y t o e n dur e .
Hon e st y is n ot so m uc h a c r e dit as an ab sol ut e p r e r e quisit e t o e ffic ie n t se r vic e t o t h e p ub l ic . Un l e ss a m an is h on e st , w e h ave n o r ig h t t o ke e p h im in p ub l ic l ife ; it m at t e r s n ot h ow b r il l ian t h is c ap ac it y."
— Th e odor e
Roose ve l t
Want to be on our
lists?
It w il l t ake up t o 72 Hour s t o t ake you off
of l ist s!
No comments:
Post a Comment