SHOULD WASH., D.C. OBEY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TODAY? FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - FEB. 1, 2014

SHOULD WASH., D.C. OBEY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TODAY? FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - FEB. 1, 2014

Article I Section 2, Tennessee Constitution: "Non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind."

      In a nation that believed in national honor, the obvious answer would be "YES!" In a nation that believed in that their legal word of commitment was binding on them, the obvious answer would be again "YES!" However, we live in America where Obama at the White House and members of Congress rationalize the many ways they evade obeying the U.S. Constitution and especially the 10 U.S. Bill Of Rights which had a preamble to them written by the U.S. Congress saying that the U.S. Bill Of Rights was higher than the rest of the U.S. Constitution in legal authority which meant that the rest of the U.S. Constitution including the treaty clause did not have the legal authority to override the U.S. Bill Of Rights as higher legal authority than the rest of the U.S. Constitution. This preamble written by the U.S. Congress as the front legal statement for the 10 U.S. Bill Of Rights was ratified along with the 10 Bill of Rights that passed and were ratified by the States.  

Making of the Charters The Declaration The Constitution The Bill of Rights Impact of the Charters

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution. RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz. ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. The Bill of Rights: A Transcription The Preamble to The Bill of Rights Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution. RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz. ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights." Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Amendments 11-27 Note: The capitalization and punctuation in this version is from the enrolled original of the Joint Resolution of Congress proposing the Bill of Rights, which is on permanent display in the Rotunda of the National Archives Building, Washington, D.C.

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

SINCE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, AND OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE ACT LIKE THEY DON'T LEGALLY KNOW THAT THE U.S. BILL OF RIGHTS ARE HIGHER IN LEGAL AUTHORITY THAN THE REST OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, THIS IS LESSON 101 IN ELEMENTARY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR THE IGNORANT IN WASH., D.C. SWEARING ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND NOT KNOWING THAT THEY REGULARLY VIOLATE IT BY THEIR PASSED LAWS AND ISSUED POLICIES, AND BY INCORRECT, INVALID FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS.  LEGAL COMMENT BY ERASMUS OF AMERICA WHO BOTHERED TO READ THE ORIGINAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS WHICH FOUNDED AMERICA AS A NATION!

      Below are some binding legal principles on the leaders of Wash., D.C. which many in Wash., D.C. act like they don't know about these legal principles being legally binding on them and what they do in Wash., D.C.! Also, applies to state law in questions of the authority of the U.S. Constitution binding on states.

     1. No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the positive guarantees of the Federal Constitution. (16 AmJur 2nd, 70)

     2. No emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution. (16 AmJur 2nd, 71)

     3. Neither emergency nor economic necessity justifies a disregard of cardinal constitutional guaranties. (16 AmJur 2nd, 81)

     4. Any attempt to do that which is prescribed in the Constitution in any manner other than that prescribed, or to do that which is prohibited is repugnant to that supreme and paramount law and is invalid. (16 AmJur 2nd, 82)

      Since the constitution is intended for the observance of the judiciary as well as the other departments of government and the judges are sworn to support its provisions, the courts are not at liberty to overlook or disregard its commands, or countenance evasions thereof. It is their duty in authorized proceedings to give effect to the existing constitution and to obey all constitutional provisions, irrespective of their opinion as to the wisdom or desirability of such provisions, and irrespective of the consequences.  

     If the constitution prescribes one rule and the statute another and a different rule, it is the duty of the courts to declare that the constitution, and not the statute, governs in cases before them for judgment.

     ---16 AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE 2nd 

      Legal comment from Erasmus of America. Judges are sworn to uphold the constitution and not legal precedents. If legal precedents conflict with the constitution, the judge is supposed to rule according to the U.S. Constitution and not according to legal precedents.

      Since there is no legal regard for what the U.S. Constitution says in legal intent in too many legal circles in Wash., D.C. and sometimes in legal circles in state level as well, I wrote this legal reminder based upon the legal historical records of America to refresh their memory what is binding constitutional law on them! As legal integrity is not too apparent in many governmental circles, I wrote up my Omni Law which in full legal name is "The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America" as posted on my website. The short version of this proposed constitutional amendment can be found on the front page of my website under my book writeup on early Christianity called "The Early Roots Of Apostolic Christianity" by Erasmus Of America (my pen name). Someone just looked up on Google search engine "The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America" and found three writeups and links for my proposed constitutional amendment on the front page so it is not hard to find to read and/or copy and send to others. An Omni Law is a law totally comprehensive in some legal field. As one or more other sources also claim an Omni Law for what  they stand for legally, use the full proper name of "The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America" and you will be lead to my proposed constitutional amendment which has not yet been passed into law in America. My proposed constitutional amendment will once passed into law effectively enforce the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill Of Rights as authority over laws claimed made law by Congress when they violate the authority of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill Of Rights, effectively block the White House from acting like a dictatorship decreeing whatever they want as alleged law and policy instead of obeying the terms of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill Of Rights, and slap down invalid decisions of courts trying to ignore the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Bill  Of Rights and make whim the basis of court decisions instead of obeying constitutional law over their court decisions.

      Ancient Rome ran into the same problem of corrupt leadership in the Roman Republic ignoring the rights of the people and obeying their constitutional guidelines, so created civil tribunes which forced the Roman Republic to become an honest national government for several centuries until the corrupt finally figured out how to overthrow civil tribune authority so they could return the Roman Republic to the corrupt standards Rome had until the common people walked out and were going to found a second Rome unless the city elders gave them civil tribunes to keep the government honest. James Madison, "Father of the U.S. Constitution" and "Father of the U.S. Bill Of Rights" praised the civil tribune concept of ancient Rome as the smartest concept of ancient man to protect his legal rights and force the government to obey the will of the people instead of crush them by would-be masters in government. He thought that the government being created by the American Revolution and constitutional convention would be run by honorable men to uphold the political charter given to the elected leaders by authority of the American people, so thought that copying the civil tribune concept of a legal watchdog over would-be corruption in government would be unnecessary for America. As a long train of abuses has shown, he was wrong on this point and so the idea that he endorsed as the smartest of ancient man on earth needs to also be used for our times to protect the American people from tyranny and a government out of control and not wishing to serve the real will of the American people.

      Also, a new warning for the American people. An international legal source that Wash., D.C. agrees to as authority over them has come up with a plan how to quick seize and confiscate the wealth of any American in America under their global wealth confiscation plan. They will target even your savings accounts and retirement accounts, home equity, etc. They will strike fast so you can't save any wealth you have saved up in life. Obama will love these boys and allow them to freely steal from you all you possess that could be called "wealth." Under our Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America, we will not allow this and will arrest any foreign sources trying to come into America to do this! Remember the Preamble to the U.S. Bill Of Rights says that your legal rights listed here are higher in authority than any treaty agreement engineered by Obama who does not care in the least about your legal rights in America guaranteed by the U.S. Bill Of Rights. Also, you have other legal rights listed in the original U.S. Constitution but they never taught you in the school system what these legal rights are you have in the first part of the U.S. Constitution. And these first legal rights cannot be taken away from you except by constitutional amendment canceling these legal rights of yours. It was Alexander Hamilton who said you already had legal rights in the U.S. Constitution so a Bill Of Rights was not needed to be added to the U.S. Constitution. And he argued that your state bill of rights could not be overruled by federal authority and federal courts had to also obey your state bill of rights if they were trying to try you in a federal court. What short memories corrupt federal leaders have through your legal rights as American citizens. He said that the U.S. Constitution granted no legal authority to the federal government to overrule or ignore your state bills of rights! Fortunately, Alexander Hamilton was ignored by the American people and States so you also got a U.S. Bill Of Rights as well created by those American leaders who mistrusted whether the federal government being created would always respect your legal rights unless forced to by formal law.

       Unless you want to spend a lifetime building up some wealth for yourself and family and then having it suddenly confiscated by federal government or else foreign sources granted claimed authority to do this by Obama, etc., pass our Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America (short name we used as "Omni Law" but some are trying to confuse our proposed law with something else called by "Omni-Law technically, so best to use the full formal name now!). Wise to pass our proposed constitutional amendment now as this international source that Obama would let do this to you is maybe eyeing even an RV of foreign currencies to take away from you what final money you end up with from it shortly after you get it!

         Pass this report around all over America unless you want to live under "Big Brother 1984" style government which Obama stands for! Pass our proposed constitutional amendment so you have 10 legal trustees over the federal government who will legally protect you from illegal acts by Obama and others in Wash., D.C. who think that constitutional law is a joke to them and not to be taken seriously by them! These 10 legal trustees set up by this constitutional amendment are called "Civil Tribunes" after ancient Roman law because the legal precedents this position represents by official legal history cannot be controlled by the corrupt leadership of Congress, the White House, etc. This was a legal maneuver so you have some in Wash., D.C. who truly represent you and not corrupt interests. As Sonny Bono said while in Congress and probably shortly before he either died by accident or else engineered murder looking like a ski accident, the American people needed to hire two or three lobbyists in Wash., D.C. for them so someone would represent them in Congress!

       Our website is www.fastboomamericaneconomy.com Our email is fastboomamericaneconomy.com@gmail.com Our mailing address for payments sent in by mail instead of through our website is: NIFI, P.O. Box 1465, Seneca, SC 29679 . Make checks, etc. out to NIFI and tell us what the payment is for whether for a product from the website or else our loan program for the Omni Law Drive which is the Omni Law Loan Program. Everything helps to finance our Omni Law Drive. We are rattling the nerves of some of the corrupt now in Wash., D.C. as they suspect that we might well win soon now and they don't want Wash., D.C. made an honest government again by passage of our proposed constitutional amendment!

      Yours For God And Country, Erasmus Of America (pen name for that American leader who maybe is helping to help prove the old saying true that "The pen is mightier than the sword!")