Thursday, February 20, 2014

SOCIALIZED MEDICINE THE PATH TO DICTATORSHIP

Hello Again Friends...
This was written by the lady who hosted the coffee-meeting with Congressman Rohrbacher that I attended. It's a bit long but SO WORTH reading! She also included Regan's speech from 1961 where he describes the path to Socialism via healthcare!
Also wanted to thank a bunch of you who emailed me yesterday to tell me that you called (or emailed) your congressman...thank you SO MUCH....it means a lot to me that there are others willing to fight for this great country! It takes just a few seconds...call and tell them you want them to SUPPORT DEFUNDING O'CARE...that's all you have to say! ~Cari

I started to send this out yesterday but then thought perhaps I should just think about it overnight and perhaps my inclinations would change after a good sleep. Instead, I woke up to the front page of the Register this morning to find the headlines: "Understanding Obamacare: Republicans are ramping up the opposition to the Affordable Care Act before enrollment begins" and "Groups Undermine New Health Law...Republicans who object to the government's health care coverage plan, popularly called Obamacare, are launching protests...."
I think my analysis is spot on. What do you think?
Anita
I was asked several times today to evaluate the meeting with our Congressman and I thought I would share my observations, which have evolved over the course of the day. This is a counterpoint to the implosion theory our Republican leaders so desperately want us to buy into and which was offered today as a solution to the Obamacare crisis. I continue to believe that the only way to rid ourselves of this nightmare is to defund and attach to the continuing resolution. So, without ever relying on the permanency of entitlements argument, here goes.
Today we were told that all we had to do was fund Obamacare and the whole thing would implode and we would live happily ever after. I reject this hypothesis because it presupposes that Obamacare is all about healthcare. Obamacare has never been about healthcare, but about power and control over the lives of the people of this country. Government control over every aspect of our lives has been a progressive dream for almost a century and they are invested in the concept now more than ever as it approaches a reality. They are not about to give it up, implosion or not. They will fight harder to save it!
Obamacare is the law of the land - it can't just go away or cease to exist. It must either be defunded or repealed - that's how laws and the Constitution work. Progressives will never admit that Obamacare doesn't work. It doesn't matter whether it is a success or a failure, they say it is a success, and so it must be. No matter how bad things get, they will neither repeal, defund or admit failure tomorrow any more than they would today. Republicans envision a pick-up in seats but the go-along attitude of the Republicans threatens base support. Stalemate will persist, as gerry-mandering promises the status quo, and Obamacare,
We live in a world defined by the progressive media, which lives in an alternate universe not based in reality. They will be a willing accomplice to this charade that Obamacare is a success. In fact, this messaging has begun and was evident in comments made by a progressive guest on the Hannity show tonight. But if by chance they do admit failure, it will be messaged as the fault of the Republicans regardless of whether it is funded or not. And the blame will stick. Why? Because they own the media, and the uninformed and the misinformed. Do you remember the comments today on Republican messaging? We are almost at the midpoint to the next election. Has anything about our messaging really changed since the November loss?
The left will slowly, methodically, and always progressing, advance their agenda - surely single payer will fix the minor bugs in the system. The press will agree. So will the uninformed and the misinformed. And if a weak Legislative Branch doesn't go along, who is to stop the executive order to save Obamacare? After all, it's for the children.
The House has the power of the purse, if not now, then when will they use it? If they allow this abomination, Americans will never be truly free again. There is no escaping the tentacles of the Affordable Care Act, whether it is the navigators, the forced home inspections, the IRS or the death panels, and " ...one of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free."
Ronald Reagan, Twilight Speech [to address socialized medicine, 1961, below)
Twilight Speech
1961 - My name is Ronald Reagan. I have been asked to talk on several subjects that have to do with the problems of the day. It must seem presumptuous to some of you that a member of my profession would stand here and attempt to talk to anyone on serious problems that face the nation and the world. It would be strange if it were otherwise.
Most of us in Hollywood are very well aware of the concept or the misconception that many people, our fellow citizens, have about people in show business. It was only a generation ago that people of my profession couldn’t be buried in the churchyard. Of course the world has improved since then, we can be buried now. As a matter of fact, the eagerness of somebody to perform that service gets frightening at times.
Now back in 1927 an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.
There are many ways in which our government has invaded the precincts of private citizens, the method of earning a living. Our government is in business to the extent of owing more than 19,000 businesses covering 47 different lines of activity. This amounts to a fifth of the total industrial capacity of the United States.
But at the moment I’d like to talk about another way, because this threat is with us and at the moment is more imminent.
One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.
Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.
So, with the American people on record as not wanting socialized medicine, Congressman Furan introduced the Furan Bill. This was the idea that all people of Social Security should be brought under a program of compulsory health insurance.
Now this would not only be our senior citizens, this would be the dependents and those who are disabled. This would be young people if they are dependents of someone eligible for Social Security.
Now Congressman Furan brought the program out on that idea of just for that particular group of people. But Congressman Furan was subscribing to this foot in the door philosophy because he said, “If we can only break through and get our foot inside the door, then we can expand the program after that.”
Walter Ruether said, “It’s no secret that the United Automobile Workers is officially on record as backing a program of national health insurance.” And by national health insurance he meant socialized medicine for every American.
Well let’s see what the Socialists themselves had to say about it. They say, “Once the Furan Bill is passed this nation will be provided with a mechanism for socialized medicine capable of indefinite expansion in every direction until it includes the entire population.” Well, we can’t say that we haven’t been warned.
Now Congressman Furan is no longer a Congressman of the United States Government. He has been replaced, not in his particular assignment but in his backing of such a bill by Congressman King of California.
It is presented in the idea of a great emergency that millions of our senior citizens are unable to provide needed medical care. But this ignores the fact that in the last decade 127 million of our citizens, in just ten years, have come under the protection of some kind of privately owned or hospital insurance.
Now the advocates of this bill when you try to oppose it challenge you on an emotional basis, they say what would you do, throw these poor old people out to die with no medical attention?
That’s ridiculous, and of course no one has advocated it. As a matter of fact, in the last session of Congress a bill was adopted known as the Kerr/Mills Bill. Now without even allowing this bill to be tried to see if it works they have introduced this King Bill, which is really the Furan Bill.
What is the Kerr/Mills Bill? It is a frank recognition of the medical need or problem of our senior citizens that I have mentioned. And it has provided from the federal government money to the states and local communities that can be used at the discretion of the state to help those people who need it.
Now what reason could the other people have for backing a bill which says we insist on compulsory health insurance for senior citizens on a basis of age alone, regardless of whether they are worth millions of dollars, whether they have an income, whether they’re protected by their own insurance, whether they have savings.
I think we can be excused for believing, that as ex-Congressman Furan said, “This was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted all the time, socialized medicine.”
James Madison in 1788, speaking to the Virginia Convention said, “Since the general civilization of mankind I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
They want to attach this bill to Social Security, and they say here is a great insurance program now instituted now working.
Let’s take a look at social security itself. Again, very few of us disagree with the original premise that there should be some form of savings that would keep destitution from following unemployment by reason of death, disability or old age. And to this end, social security was adopted, but it was never intended to supplant private savings, private insurance, pension programs of unions and industries.
Now in our country under our free enterprise system we have seen medicine reach the greatest heights that it has in any country in the world. Today, the relationship between patient and doctor in this country is something to be envied any place. The privacy, the care that is given to a person, the right to chose a doctor, the right to go from one doctor to the other.
But let’s also look from the other side, at the freedom the doctor loses. A doctor would be reluctant to say this. Well, like you, I am only a patient, so I can say it in his behalf. The doctor begins to lose freedoms; it’s like telling a lie, and one leads to another. First you decide that the doctor can have so many patients. They are equally divided among the various doctors by the government. But then the doctors aren’t equally divided geographically, so a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town and the government has to say to him you can’t live in that town, they already have enough doctors. You have to go some place else. And from here it is only a short step to dictating where he will go.
This is a freedom that I wonder whether any of us have the right to take from any human being. I know how I’d feel if you fellow citizens decided that to be an actor I had to become a government employee and work in a national theater.
Take it into your own occupation or that of your husband. All of us can see what happens once you establish the precedent that the government can determine a man’s working place and his working methods, determine his employment. From here it is a short step to all the rest of socialism, to determining his pay and pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him where he will go to work and what he will do.
In this country of ours took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in worlds history, the only true revolution. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another.
But here for the first time in all the thousands of years of man’s relation to man, a little group of men, the founding fathers, for the first time established the idea that you and I had within ourselves the God-given right and ability to determine our own destiny. This freedom was built into our government with safeguards.
We talk democracy today, and strangely we let democracy begin to assume the aspect of majority rule is all that is needed. Well majority rule is a fine aspect of democracy provided there are guarantees written in to our government concerning the rights of the individual and of the minorities.
What can we do about this? Well, you and I can do a great deal. We can write to our congressmen and our senators. We can say right now that we want no further encroachment on these individual liberties and freedoms. And at the moment, the key issue is, we do not want socialized medicine.
Now you may think that when I say write to the Congressman or Senator that this is like writing fan mail to a television program, it isn’t. In Washington today 40,000 letters, less than one hundred per Congressman are evidence of a trend in public thinking.
Former Representative Halleck of Indiana has said, “When the American people want something from Congress, regardless of its political complexion, if they make their wants known, Congress does what the people want.”
So write, it’s as simple as finding just the name of your Congressman, or your Senator. Then you address your letter to that individuals name, if he’s a Congressman, to the House Office Building, Washington D.C. If he’s a Senator, to the Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.
And if this man writes back to you and tells you that he or she too is for free enterprise, that we have these great services and so forth, that must be performed by government, don’t let them get away with it. Show that you have not been convinced. Write a letter right back and tell them that you believe in government economy and fiscal responsibility; that you know that governments don’t tax to get the money the need; governments will always find a need for the money they get and that you demand the continuation of our traditional free enterprise system. You and I can do this. The only way we can do it is by writing to our congressmen even we believe that he is on our side to begin with. Write to strengthen his hand. Give him the ability to stand before his colleagues in Congress and say “I have heard from my constituents and this is what they want.”
Write those letters now; call your friends and them to write them. If you don’t, this program I promise you, will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow, and behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country. Until, one day, as Normal Thomas said we will awake to find that we have socialism. And if you don’t do this and if I don’t do it, one of these days you and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.

Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library & Museum

No comments: