Mainstream press in the USA, is itself one of the biggest terrorist organizations on the planet.
-----------------------
“Charlie Hebdo Story Simply Doesn’t Wash… In Place of Investigation, the Media Repeats Implausible Story.”
Paul Craig Roberts
Editor’s Note: The stripes of a false flag psyop are starting to show through the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo.
Just after the event, SHTF pointed to the
suspicions raised about the authenticity of shootings, which showed no
blood and no recoil in slowed down video.
But now, the highly orchestrated reaction by
world leaders playing heart strings with one hand, and unleashing an
agenda for more spying powers with the other is revealing more of the
bigger picture.
The Media Repeats Implausible Story
In this article, alternative media’s foremost
cynic, a seasoned critic who worked inside Reagan’s Treasury Department
and as an assistant editor at the Wall Street Journal, is pointing out
the telltale signs of an operation – run not by amateur jihadist kids,
but by professional intelligence operatives.
He concludes, “Americans are a pitifully misinformed people. All of history is a history of false flag operations.”
In particular, Roberts makes the case that, like
9/11, the details of the attack were carried out in a many inconsistent
with the profiles of the suspects; namely, it was too professional.
A key police official involved in the investigation suddenly committed suicide during the investigation.
The discovery of IDs by the authorities was too
convenient, and reminiscent of the unlikely and impossible details of
the official 9/11 fable.
The links between American, British and Israeli
intelligence to anything reeking of Muslim terrorism is just too close,
and to helpful to their geopolitical agenda.
Now, the media and politicians are too eager to carry the water on this one, and use the event for a whole new ballgame.
The convenient return of Islamic terrorism is
already being used to justify the very NSA and intelligence spying
Americans and the world become so outraged at following the Edward
Snowden leaks.
Did anyone notice that in the wake of Hebdo,
former NSA chief and also former CIA director Michael Hayden went on the
boob tube and boasted about how useful all that spy data was now.
Hayden stated:
“These massive amounts of metadata that NSA held
in storage. That metadata doesn’t look all that scary this morningand I
wouldn’t be surprised if the French services pick up cell phones
associated with the attack and ask the Americans, ‘where have you seen
these phones active globally?’.
Maybe they do need spies like us, after all, Huh?
Are you seeing the bigger picture yet?
The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation.
The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a
disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly
trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and
killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional.
It is like two different sets of people.
Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in
the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were
determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat.
Their identity was allegedly established by the
claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the
getaway car.
Such a mistake is inconsistent with the
professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport
found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to
establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.
It is a plausible inference that the ID left
behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers,
convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never
hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie
Hebdo.
An important fact that supports this inference
is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the
alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on
social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly
turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by
security forces as a terrorist.
Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi.
If so, this makes him the despoiler of a false
flag attack. Authorities will have to say that despite being wrong about
Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers.
Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of confession that supports the official story.
The American and European media have ignored the
fact that Mourad turned himself in for protection from being killed as a
terrorist as he has an alibi.
I googled Hamid Mourad and all I found (January
12) was the main US and European media reporting that the third suspect
had turned himself in.
The reason for his surrender was left out of the reports.
The news was reported in a way that gave
credence to the accusation that the suspect who turned himself in was
part of the attack on Charlie Hebdo.
Not a single US mainstream media source reported that the alleged suspect turned himself in because he has an ironclad alibi.
Some media merely reported Mourad’s surrender in a headline with no coverage in the report.
The list
that I googled includes the Washington Post (January 7 by Griff Witte
and Anthony Faiola); Die Welt (Germany) “One suspect has turned himself
in to police in connection with Wednesday’s massacre at the offices of
Parisian satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo;” ABC News (January 7)
“Youngest suspect in Charlie Hebdo Attack turns himself in;” CNN
(January 8) “Citing sources, the Agence France Presse news agency
reported that an 18-year-old suspect in the attack had surrendered to
police.”
Another puzzle in
the official story that remains unreported by the presstitute media is
the alleged suicide of a high ranking member of the French Judicial
Police who had an important role in the Charlie Hebdo investigation.
For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police
official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime,
decided to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8
(both dates are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the
night while writing his report on his investigation.
A google search as of 6pm EST January 13 turns up no mainstream US media report of this event.
The alternative media reports it, as do some UK newspapers, but without suspicion or mention whether his report has disappeared.
The official story is that Fredou was suffering
from “depression” and “burnout,” but no evidence is provided. Depression
and burnout are the standard explanations of mysterious deaths that
have unsettling implications.
Once again we see the US print and TV media serving as a ministry of propaganda for Washington.
In place of investigation, the media repeats the government’s implausible story.
It behoves us all to think.
Why would Muslims be more outraged by cartoons
in a Paris magazine than by hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed by
Washington and its French and NATO vassals in seven countries during the
past 14 years?
If Muslims wanted to make a point of the cartoons, why not bring a hate crime charge or lawsuit?
Imagine what would happen to a European magazine
that dared to satirize Jews in the way Charlie Hebdo satirized Muslims.
Indeed, in Europe people are imprisoned for investigating the holocaust
without entirely confirming every aspect of it.
If a Muslim lawsuit was deep-sixed by French authorities, the Muslims would have made their point.
Killing people merely contributes to the
demonization of Muslims, a result that only serves Washington’s wars
against Muslim countries.
If Muslims are responsible for the attack on Charlie Hebdo, what Muslim goal did they achieve?
None whatsoever.
Indeed, the attack attributed to Muslims has
ended French and European sympathy and support for Palestine and
European opposition to more US wars against Muslims.
Just recently France had voted in the UN with Palestine against the US-Israeli position.
This assertion of an independent French foreign
policy was reinforced by the recent statement by the President of France
that the economic sanctions against Russia should be terminated.
Clearly, France was showing too much foreign policy independence.
The attack on Charlie Hebdo serves to cow France and place France back under Washington’s thumb.
Some will contend that Muslims are sufficiently stupid to shoot themselves in the head in this way.
But how do we reconcile such alleged stupidity with the alleged Muslim 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo professional attacks?
***************
If we believe the official story, the 9/11
attack on the US shows that 19 Muslims, largely Saudis, without any
government or intelligence service support, outwitted not only all 16 US
intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, Dick Cheney and
all the neoconservatives in high positions throughout the US government,
and airport security, but also the intelligence services of NATO and
Israel’s Mossad.
****************
How can such intelligent and capable people, who
delivered the most humiliating blow in world history to an alleged
Superpower with no difficulty whatsoever despite giving every indication
of their intentions, possibly be so stupid as to shoot themselves in
the head when they could have thrown France into turmoil with a mere
lawsuit?
The Charlie Hebdo story simply doesn’t wash.
If you believe it, you are no match for a Muslim.
Some who think that they are experts will say
that a false flag attack in France would be impossible without the
cooperation of French intelligence.
To this I say that it is practically a certainty
that the CIA has more control over French intelligence than does the
President of France.
Operation Gladio proves this.
The largest part of the government of Italy was
ignorant of the bombings conducted by the CIA and Italian Intelligence
against European women and children and blamed on communists in order to
diminish the communist vote in elections.
Americans are a pitifully misinformed people.
All of history is a history of false flag
operations. Yet Americans dismiss such proven operations as “conspiracy
theories,” which merely proves that government has successfully
brainwashed insouciant Americans and deprived them of the ability to
recognize the truth.
Americans are the foremost among the captive nations.
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2015/01/15/charlie-hebdo-story-simply-doesnt-wash-in-place-of-investigation-the-media-repeats-implausible-story/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29
------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment