Saturday, November 14, 2015

UPDATE ON FREEWILL AND HIS LEGAL FIGHT - 2015 NOV 14

 

UPDATE ON FREEWILL'S LEGAL FIGHT

  NOVEMBER 14

originally published October 18th

I've seen speculation and wreckless commentation on the matter posted on this site. These serve no helpfull purpose.

Some have asked for clarification and details. Some have inquired into the nature of the so-called "charges" against Freewill. It's clear that there are a great many of Americans who haven't yet stepped out of the box to see matters for what they really are, but continue to view and discuss matters in terms and viewpoints drilled into our heads from childhood by the de facto government.

Before anyone ever inquires into the details of a charge, first, evaluate whether a crime has been committed, period, to know whether the charge is falsified or even fraudulent. This goes for anyone, anywhere; and in the de facto government's false courts which ignore the Constitution and which uphold color of law in place of natural and common laws, it's of paramount importance. By law, a crime cannot exist in absence of an injured party, a victim. Get this fact past all the de facto's mental programming and etch it in your memory. This fact has been true since the beginnings of law, thousands of years before our time. There is no, I repeat, NO injured party to have filed the present claims against Freewill. The "charges" against Freewill, in absence of an injured party, are mere CLAIMS against him, claims under maritime law, claims which are unlawfull and constitute fraud; it doesn't matter what the "charges" are if no victim exists, be they motor vehicle code violations (as in Freewill's ongoing cases) or collecting rain water for clean drinking water (yes, there are "charges" being allowed in the courts to victimize those who simply seek to exercise the natural right to gather rain water for their own use). There are NO contracts in existence upon which to base the claims, a fact which fits the definition of fraud; furthermore, the claimant, THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, is a bankrupt corporation, DEAD legally, and the DEAD cannot file legal claims, based on the very fact that NO dead man or woman has ever risen from the grave to step into a court to file a claim. In fact, every bankrupt entity MUST DISCLOSE THE FACT OF ITS BANKRUPT STATUS BEFORE ENTERING INTO ANY CONTRACT, so that the contracted party is made aware of the fact that the bankrupt entity cannot be relied upon to produce assets and/or monies upon demand for compensation under terms of the contract (meaning, if you're going to contract with a bankrupt entity, get your compensation up front, and don't execute your side of the contract until you've received said compensation to your satisfaction). Moreover, ONLY a trustee of the 1933 bankruptcy can speak in any courtroom on behalf of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and any and all of its franchises, subsidiaries, employees and agents, to include THE STATE OF MICHIGAN; ANY PROSECUTOR WHO STANDS AND SPEAKS ON BEHALF OF THESE BANKRUPT ENTITIES COMMITS FELONY CRIMES, INCLUDING IMPERSONATION OF TRUSTEES OF THE 1933 BANKRUPTCY, AND ANY JUDGE WHO ALLOWS THE IMPERSONATION TO CONTINUE ONCE POINTED OUT COMMITS FELONY CRIMES, CRIMES INCLUDING TREASON, A CAPITAL CRIME, PUNISHABLE BY IMMEDIATE HANGING IN THE NEAREST STREET INTERSECTION. With NO victim, and thus no crime, there is NO lawfull basis for imprisonment of Freewill.

Freewill's stint in the facilities of CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL has come to an end. Two cases remain open, cases in which THE STATE OF MICHIGAN agents have filed illegal claims. The agents decreased their ransom demands when it became apparent that Freewill would not submit to them and their liability for false imprisonment was quickly racking up into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. Freewill's friends paid enough of the demanded amount to get Freewill released from captivity in CRAWFORD COUNTY JAIL facilitites. The same day, agents for BAY COUNTY SHERIFF "arrested" (kidnapped according to bona fide law) Freewill to hold him for ransom in BAY COUNTY JAIL facilities on virtually identical claims, again filed by agents for THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, including JUDGE DAWN A KLIDA, Judge Dawn A Klida, Dawn Klida, KURT C ASBURY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, Kurt C Asbury Prosecuting Attorney, and Kurt Asbury. According to a source close to Freewill, at the arraignment hearing the following day, Oct. 16th, the presiding Judge, a Judge who Freewill has faced in the past and put in her lawfull place, a Judge who wanted a piece of Freewill afterward but had her hands tied, a Judge who wanted to take advantage of holding Freewill captive to prevent him from accessing documents to stand up to her again as she intended to stick it to him, Judge Dawn A Klida, decided or was instructed to remove herself from the case, either to limit her personal liability in the matter and/or the liability of her employer in the matter. It's unknown at present which of Bay County's Judges will consent to commit crimes by proceeding as party to fraud at the pre-trial hearing in mid-November. The Judges and Prosecutors in Bay County are fully aware of the very real likelihood of being added as defendants to Freewill's federal lawsuit, as well as the very real possibility of being arrested for felony crimes at the pre-trial hearing should they proceed with their intended activities. It's obviously a game to them, akin to poker. They do want their payday if they can get it. The question is, do they have the constitution to face the music should they be caught red-handed executing a fraudulent claim and engaging in additional felony crimes, or will they choose, wisely, to drop their proceedings and release Freewill from unlawfull captivity whilst the damages they've inflicted upon him are relatively manageable?

(As of the arraignment hearing, the Bay County court's ransom demand was lowered to $5000. We're hopefull that this demand will decrease again, soon, as the full scope of what's being brought to bear on the judge and prosecutor becomes clearer to them; I, however, cannot speak for these individuals, only they can. Our position in being able to meet the present demand is insufficient.)

With NO trustee of the 1933 bankruptcy present to evaluate THE STATE OF MICHIGAN's claim for legality, THE STATE OF MICHIGAN and its agents, the Bay County Judge, the Bay County Prosecutor, and the Bay County Sheriff all stand in contempt of court, in contempt of Constitution, and in treason. Freewill's imprisonment is unlawfull, aka false imprisonment. False imprisonment, in conjunction with demand for payment for the prisoner's freedom, is no different than kidnapping and holding for ransom. These felony crimes committed and being committed by THE STATE OF MICHIGAN employees, in accordance with corporate [internal] policy, as well as in violation of corporate policy proclaimed to be statutes, proclaimed to be law under color of law, are the crimes we all need to be investigating, learning, and prosecuting. That which has been lodged against Freewill is nothing more than a smokescreen, a ruse, an excuse to drag the man through the de facto's money making machine. If you don't see it that way, you have a lot to learn about the system of slavery we're caught up in, and i strongly suggest you look into how THE DUTCH EAST INDIA TRADING COMPANY, and THE VIRGINIA TRADING COMPANY, conducted themselves in foreign lands, for these corporations are the precursors to corporation THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and all have a long history of invading foreign lands to get rid of the rightfull rulers/governors and leave in place corporate employees who masqueraded as government to enslave the free peoples and rape both the peoples and their lands of wealth and virtue, for profit. This literally is the system we are being subjected to at this very moment, a centuries-old crime spree.

The de facto government has engaged in a long standing campaign, reorganized in the period 1778-1791, when THE VIRGINIA TRADING COMPANY set itself up as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, to distort our perception of and understanding of everything which goes on around us as the corporation worked to covertly enslave us all, and exploit us as well as our bountifull lands. This was accomplished behind closed doors, over years, with keen sense of caution to move slowly enough that we didn't see their movements going on right before our very eyes; but sum it up, two+ centuries of baby steps, and we see a colossal enslavement and pillaging scheme, with trillions in profits going to the criminals who executed the scheme. We all feel something is wrong in how the de facto conducts itself. But to put it into words, to picture it in our minds, results in conflicting images- conflict which arises by virtue of the mental programming we've all been subjected to at the hands of the de facto goverment's agents and minions, and, sad to say, at the hands of our own parents, who simply have been raised as victims of the same mental programming campaign. This campaign has been conducted over many generations since that time, with the hope that our elders buy into it in their youth and teach it to us as we grow up, with the hope that this self-perpetuating brainwashing sustains itself and requires little maintenance, with the hope that the public school system can be exploited to reinforce the propaganda (any public school which refuses as a matter of principle simply is cut off from funding, or even shut down, putting the school's employees out of work and out of retirement pensions), and with the hope that the extensive purchase of mass media sources and facilities and their use in augmenting the propaganda is sufficient to counter the information revolution ushered in by the internet. The propaganda is aimed at keeping us focused on, thinking in terms of, and perceiving our experiences and interactions with the de facto government, as benign, cumbersome at times, but necessary. The propaganda system never admits or allows information which accurately portrays the de facto government- when has a public school teacher ever taught his/her students that THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, a corporation which is acting as our government until the day that we decide to dismiss the corporation and resume de jure governance of ourselves? When has any of the de facto goverment ever informed any of us that it is a foreign nationality, operating on our nation's soil, and we have the right to shut it down and deport its employees at any time? When has any of the de facto government ever informed any of us that it conducts itself under maritime law, ON LAND, illegally, by virtue of having declared that everything physically above land is water (in direct contradiction of reality and truth), and thus falls under maritime law? When has any of the de facto government ever presented full documentation to any of us regarding its creation, licensing, mission, and policies for both acting as government and relinquishing governance to us at our demand?

The more of us who learn this information and explore it further, the more of us who decide to help flesh out the details, and the more of us who decide to put the information to use to dismiss the de facto goverment's leadership and minions and repopulate the elected offices with people not beholden to the BAR and other foreign nationals, the sooner we can reassert de jure governance, government of, by and for the men and women who wish to live free on these lands, free from debtor slavery, free from unlawfull control, free to breathe clean air, free to grow and eat clean and natural foods, free to gather and drink clean water, free from living in a police state, free from all the corruption and crime in our government, free of all the wrongs done in our name on lands afar, free to raise ourselves up and raise up those around us, if they want, to make a better world.

FreeDom

58 comments:

Teepee said...

Freewill, you are so brave to stand up against the system as you have done. I only wish we all were as knowledgeable as you are in order to fight back. The system would get me all confused if I tried to fight back with what I've been reading and learning from this site; I'm a senior and find I can't recall as fast as I want to to fight. Plus, there are some things I just don't really understand. WELCOME BACK PIONEER!!

Anonymous said...

Part 1 of 3
I made comments of 'if' freewill hired an attorney what the attorney would do.
Anyone reading could think freewill hired an attorney or they could see what would happen 'if' he entered into a contract with one. It takes too many words to make sure someone doesn't misinterpret what someone is trying to convey and to cover all the angles yes, angles people can infer from the writing based on their own knowledge and experience. No I did not put an 'if' in quotes, and no I did not say this it fact. I do try to surround my comments in opinion so no will will take it as fact, but again, if someone does not read every word, they can skip the fact, yes fact, that the writing is an opinion. I'm saying this because I have commented on pretty much every post regarding freewill and even sent an email response.

Okay, now beyond that. One of my comments was as long as freewill does not contract with them he will keep his job. Have you ever seen someone popular or public like a sports figure get arrested and everyone wants to know if he's off the team, college or pro it's the same question, and the answer is, we will see what happens before we make a decision.

So, Freewill would normally be released on his own recognisance, but that was not the case, they wanted money. Once you pay it, it's no longer a ransom, it's an agreement. And no one will let him out, unless he signed a paper agreeing to be where they say he is to be when they say he is to be there, thus wiping out the employment contract because he made a NEW agreement to be somewhere whenever he's told to be there, and that takes the place of his agreement with his employer to be there whatever days and whatever time. So I know his family wanted him home, but at what expense, the expense of him being free, or so they can say he's home. Even if he was home it was not over, if he agreed to bondage. Yes, I said it. Bond, bond servant, bondage, a man can contract to be a slave, yes he can.
So if I hold someone against their will, and they make the claim they are held against their will and then they sign agreement with their holders and I look at the paperwork, and there is this signature that they agree to pay some amount for the wrong they are accused of having had done, and they will come back for a group of people to decide their penalty for the wrong they are accused to have done, then that paperwork stands as one of those 'no law impairing the obligations of contracts shall be made'.
So the first group has a contract, he's bound to them, and they let him be 'free' since it's negotiable, obviously, and the next group wants a piece.
When you pass you pass, and when you fail you fail.
No it's not over, but a group of friends is like an Eve to an Adam.
Even with their best intentions they can get in the way, and make matters worse while trying to help.
Rod Class was kidnapped until, and I do mean until he signed an agreement at the behest and insistence of his wife and friends. After that, all the paperwork he had filed, was gone, a whole new court case was created for that contract he agreed to. All the complaints he made to state and federal or whatever agencies were out the door, and could have very well been considered frivolous. He had a meeting of the minds, and it's as if both people who were on both sides of that document were in agreement of some valid terms.
To put it as bad and blunt as I can put it. A man can claim to be raped, and then agree with the woman that it was consensual sex, and there can no longer be a claim of rape even though some act had taken place that caused them to be at opposite ends of an issue and now sitting at the same table and coming to some agreement.
Will this comment be moderated out? Probably, probably not.

Anonymous said...

Part 2 of 3
Sometimes the harshest criticism and info does not make it to the masses who are waiting on a process.
What process can keep you from signing a contract, if you want to sign one so you can go home? Really? What process can save you from being your own worst enemy?

If you are grabbed enough, you will learn, you can never make a deal with the dark, cause the deal is always darker than what they had done to you previously.
And yes, maybe in some paradigm you have to have an injured party to have done wrong, and if that's the case, who are you signing the agreement with? The injured party?
And yes, in some paradigm you may have to have a bankrupt entity disclose that they are bankrupt, but if you give them something of value, ie, your life energy, your time, your body, they now have property and are no longer bankrupt are they? And yes, a prosecutor may not have the right to represent a dead or bankrupt entity, but did the paperwork you sign have any disclosures to the facts you want to claim, or did you not put that in writing?

Process does not work, because the brain cannot get past certain things, especially can't get past, that to live, you have to be inconvenience, otherwise this is not the only life they take!

If there is reincarnation, what did Freewill give up to whoever he agreed to agree with of his free will? Will he come back working for some of them in a capacity he hates, will he come back impoverished looking at the rich and mad that they are rich, forgetting or having the veil over him that he agreed to give them all that he owned, for a second of being free?

If you make a claim, come hell or high water, don't you think you should stick with it? Would O who is chief of a country sit at the table and sign the United States of whatever it is now, over to Putin or anyone so he can go home to his wife and children? After he does, where does he have a right to be? How does he have a right to be?

I'm disappointed, but it's not my life. I wanted more for Freewill and that was for him to know what he does of his freewill. He is not a victim anymore, he's someone who negotiated a bad contract, but he negotiated it with people he trusts.

It may not get posted, and I'm okay with that. I know

Anonymous said...

Part 3 of 3
what I control and what I don't, and I know I could not just 'give' Freewill the answer because I am not his God, nor Creator, nor maker, and he is the one who decides what his Act of State will experience.

He decided. I support his decision.
At least wake up and see, otherwise anyone's anger is misguided.
There is nothing done wrong from this point on. The slate is clean.
He has contracted with the agencies and recognize their existence and authority.
We are allowed to agree with a rock and worship it if we want to.
Freedom of religion.
He is allowed to contract with dead entities, and agree with them.
Freedom of speech, (in writing)
The right to life, liberty, and property, also include the right to give up the right to life, liberty an property. No law impairing the obligations of contracts shall be made.

If he'd learned contracts a bit more, he'd know.
A paper cannot free a man, and a paper cannot enslave a man, but the paper is evidence of the agreement between men who had a meeting of the minds, regardless of who they claimed to be when the agreement was made.

Love to all, including Freewill.

Fostr said...

My ex has been persecuted for 13 years by the gov, stripped him of everything, won't let him work, taken all his money, businesses, homes, reputation and now trying to send him to prison. A lot of people assume he is guilty when he is not. Everyone else in the case was found innocent so why is he guilty when there are no victims? He is now in his 70's and going to Fed Prison for doing business in this county. I am so sorry Freewill!! I only wish I could send more. My thoughts are with you.

Anonymous said...

sorry ... I started reading and the mumbo-jumbo above and it just became more of the typical patriot rhetoric.



just a couple simple comments to get readers (and perhaps the freewill fighters) back on path.

corpus delicti, body of the crime, injured party, etc. is not recognized in code, statutes, administrative procedure, military due process ... meaning, by default, that WHOLE ARGUMENT is purely a waste of time.

constitutional law, constitutional right, birthright, inherent right are ALL matters within private trust law ... and unless you are party to the "trust" AND have chosen Equity as your CHOICE OF LAW ... you are but a mere volunteer before a military due process.

there simple are no other alternatives. "intention" does not account for anything in military law.

and ... one final note ... no! ... military law and martial law are NOT the same thing.

Holy Cross said...

The irony I find here with this discussion is that many, many of us PRESUME that the "devil" will keep his word! You can scream all day long - "I have a contract!!" or "I don't have a contract". If the majority of God's children refuse to know, love and serve him then one cannot expect ANY justice or remedy. We are in the times of gathering, because it is of no use at the present moment to go up against the beast individually. When the time is right you will know and the armor and weapons will NOT be with paper or words or anger - but only faith and humility and then the eagles will descend. www.tradcatknight.com

Anonymous said...

How much longer are these black robe devils and foreign agent prosecutors in the justus system across this giant slave plantation we call a country going to get away with this out right treason and continuation of plunder and harm to the sheeple 24-7? How much longer are we going to allow these corporate Blue Gang members with a gun, badge and 007 license continue to shoot, kill, murder, kidnap, and destroy innocent lives? Even children and babies. How much longer are the sheeple going to turn their heads and pretend not to see?

THE PRIME LAW

Article I: No person, group of persons or government shall initiate force, or threat of force or fraud against any individual's self, property or contract.

Article II: Force is morally and legally justified only for protection from those who violate Article I

Article III: No exceptions shall exist for Article I and II



Anonymous said...

You still have not answered the basic question. What are the charges? In other words, what statutes does the government say he contravened?

marie said...

They did answer. THE NAZIS DID NOT GET HIM TO [SHOW HIS PAPERS.] NAZIS DO NOT LIKE IT WHEN YOU DO NOT SIT WHEN THEY TELL YOU TO SIT BECAUSE YOU ARE AN ANIMAL TO THEM. LOWER THAN THEM AND THEY ARE CONTROLLING OUR RIGHTS. WHEN YOU DO NOT OBEY THEM THEN THEY PUT YOU IN JAIL. (HIS PAPERS) ARE A STATE SPONSORED DRIVER'S LICENSE AND A STATE SPONSORED LICENSE PLATE. I BELIEVE THAT FREEWILL MADE THEM VERY ANGRY WHEN HE DID NOT FOLLOW [THE NAZI RULES.] THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT PERMISSION IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE EYES OF A NAZI REGIME. PERIOD! WHEN YOU DO THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERED A TERRORISTS BECAUSE YOU ARE CLAIMING SOVEREIGN OR FREE ON YOUR OWN LAND. NAZIS DO NOT LIKE YOU TO THINK FOR YOURSELVES AS THAT THREATENS THEIR POWER AND THEY WILL SHOW YOU. THE NAZIS HAVE USURPED YOUR LAND, MY LAND AND THEY PUT A FLAG ON IT AND CLAIMED IT AS THEIR OWN PROPERTY AND WE DID NOT DISPUTE IT IN TIME OR AT ALL ON A GRAND SCALE. I AM NOT SAYING THE WORD [NAZI] TO BE A SMART*SS. THEY ARE LITERALLY NAZIS WHO RUN THIS COUNTRY AND THE WORLD ALONG WITH THE KHAZAR FACTIONS AND SO ON,. OPERATION PAPERCLIP....BUSH

ANON 8:41: I DID NOT BOTHER TO READ THE BOOK ABOVE YOUR COMMENT BUT BEING PATRIOTIC IS GOOD THING. WE LIKE PATRIOTS IN AMERICA. TOO BAD THERE ARE VERY FEW IN THE MILITARY WHO ARE SITTING THEIR *SS*S ON THE SIDELINES. GENERAL DUNFORD!

Anonymous said...

In the Allegory of the Cave, Plato
or the
Butterflies are Free to Fly
www.butterfliesfree.com

Their power is what we give them.
Their entities are dead until we recognize them and give them life.
Their dead entities are supposedly accusing us of crimes, and we are agreeing we did something to their dead entities, as if it can see, feel, touch, or taste.
The man who speaks for the dead entity cannot tell you how he got the contract with the dead, yet we sign agreements with them, wiping out their acts and deeds to force us to agree and converting them into a written agreement to agree; so we can 'go home'.

If you only have one month, two months, or six months to protect your rights, then why not agree with them immediately to give up your rights, I mean, after all, you only plan to protect it for a month or more before you give in to them. So you either have it or you don't.
Stop pretending.

In 1910 Black's Law

FREE . 1. Unconstrained; having power to follow the dictates of his own will. Not
subject to the dominion of another. Not compelled to involuntary servitude. Used in this sense as opposed to "slave."
2 . Not bound to service for a fixed term of years; in distinction to being bound as an apprentice.

If someone signs a bond to be free, are they free?

FREEDOM . The state of being free ;
liberty; self-determination; absence of restraint ; the opposite of slavery.
The power of acting, in the character of a moral personality, according to the dictates of the will, without other check, hindrance, or prohibition than such as may be imposed by just and necessary laws and the duties of social life.
The prevalence, in the government an d constitution of a country, of such a system of laws and institutions a s secure civil liberty to the individual citizen.

A man was taken and made to not be free.
He refused to agree with the people who kidnapped him.
He was kept by them for 18 months.
They let him be free and never got a signature out of him.
Do you think that man was free or pretending to be free?
Do you think they will ever try to take his free away from him, again?
What are the odds of getting a man who is free, to consent to be in bondage to another?
Will a galactic save a man who agreed to be bound to agreements with other men?
If someone agrees to be a citizen of a corporation, will a galactic come and break that agreement?
Can someone who agrees to be a citizen of a corporation force someone to agree to be a citizen of the corporation, if they are free to not be a citizen of the corporation?
I read that we were the cause of everything that happened to us.
The one finger pointed out, meant three pointing back at me.
When I shifted my paradigm such that everything that happened to me I had something to do with it.

I could see how I played a role in everything that was in my future, and I became awake, and I stopped sleep walking.

If I was captured and kidnapped, I could see how every decision I make would determine whether I agreed with them for what would happen next.
I saw that if I signed documents with them, I gave them control over my free, and if I did not sign documents, I was free and inhibited from using what is mine.
I'm sure the 18 month man, realized the same thing, and made up his mind which way he would go.
Do you let them get away with it, by signing meeting of the minds contracts, or do you let every day they are keeping you without your consent, weigh on their life and their public roles and responsibilities, where are they responsible for holding people without their consent? Do you think that once found out, they lose their immunity?
I support Freewill.
Nothing is over until it's over.
He still has decisions to make, and each one will be of his free will.
Whether they keep their immunity when this is over, is dependent upon what Freewill chooses to do.
BTW, did you know if you enter into an unconscionable contract, you can rescind your signature if there is no full disclosure of all the terms of the agreement?

I support and love Freewill.

Fostr said...

Another part of this is his female partner had all her assets confiscated also, after lengthy hearings, she was found innocent and her money stolen was to be returned and the gov claims the 1.5 mil they do not have it to return so she just lost her home and is now homeless and her house is being auctioned. I asked why this was happening and was told "Because they can". It only takes one person in gov with an agenda, fair or unfair..just because they can.

Anonymous said...

Fostr,
In the criminal code, if someone's property is taken, there is a part in the code to send a demand for return of the property to the court, and submit a copy to the DOJ, and they have to provide information within 30 days of why they intend to keep the property or release it.

I'm not sure how many people take what happens in the courts, and make it more public by reporting it with the state and federal agencies, and naming names of the people you meet and see who do these things to you.

These fictional entities are not alive, the people, yes, US Citizens and non US Citizens who don't want anyone in the military to fire on them, they are the people who are hiding behind the corporate veil and doing this stuff to the rest of the people, in the name of the corporation.
It's the people who go from home to work, and act like they are doing the business of their job, who have to sign the contracts and agreements to make anything happen to the rest of us.

At the end of the day, they say the corporation did it. We believe it cause some design is on the top of the paper that is supposed to indicate the corporation did it.

Pull back the corporate veil and start taking names, like the classroom snitch.
They did it because they could, because people will say, 'the government is corrupt', and not even see the real man or woman who actually did the corrupt thing.

Clue. You can report anyone who works for anyone if they do a criminal act.
There is no business that has immune employees who are immune from criminal acts.
No one loses their home. It is still there. To lose something is to not be able to find it. It was stolen. Our language is messed up and we say things that aren't fact. AND, an employee working for a bank said the home belonged to the bank, but no one gets behind the scenes to find out if the CEO said it, or the CFO said it, or the attorneys working for the bank said it, or if it was just a supervisor in some department who started the process of stealing the home, and everyone and their friends sit around the campfire and say, The bank did it!
I have yet to see a bank move, speak, write something, do something.
There are a lot of employees who do things and say the bank made them do it.
Yeah! Right!

The devil made me do it! This sandwich made me do it! The bank made me do it! My car made me do it!
Yeah, right!
If you were aware, you'd know anything not alive cannot move unless someone alive makes it move. Who is the people behind what was done?
Can't you see?

Guildmaster J said...

Bingo.

A rather astute analysis, standing and capacity are fluid and dynamic;

The fed and state "employees" are presuming jurisdiction by taking silent judicial notice of the fact you are wearing clothes of a citizen, sold domestically by a corporation under their jurisdiction;

The best of jurisdictional positions can sometimes be destroyed by the simplest unrebutted presumption;

Bless,

Guildmaster J.
Guild of Tactical Wordsmiths, IRR

www.guildtac.com

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Freewill said...

Freewill has not accepted the offending party's claim. He's demanded they produce the contract under which they seek remedy and demanded they release him unless they can place said contract on the court record.

Payment of the ransom demand must be done as an outside party, not as agent for Freewill, but as an interceding independent party. This allows Freewill to remain without contract with the offending party. It's no different than paying ransom to kidnappers to sway them to release the victim. It is paying ransom to kidnappers. In any lawfull court, the damages must be inflicted before the victim can seek relief and remedy for damages. The crime of kidnapping exists. Once the ransom demand has been paid, the crime of kidnapping with intent to hold for ransom and the crime of extortion exist. The key to keeping it a criminal matter is to approach it as a criminal matter, without bringing in direct or indirect consent to contract on Freewill's part.
Make sense?

FreeDom

Freewill said...

Teepee, he's not out yet.
He's given me his login info to help keep the site going in his absence.
I sign what I author and post using the name "FreeDom"
FreeDom

Freewill said...

refer to my response to your part 1.
FreeDom

Freewill said...

Fostr, you seem to be unaware, your ex and his partner haven't been victimized by government, they've been victimized by corporate thugs, corporate thugs who work for an enormous organized criminal empire, one which uses the corporation THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and a myriad of other corporations as fronts to mask their crimes. They have been stealing and extorting wealth from anyone and everyone whom they can victimize, largely using false courts, but also using street thugs (cops,FBI,etc.). once you recognize these "government" entities as private corporations, private foreign corporations (chartered and licensed through foreign entities), run as part of a global criminal empire, stealing wealth and paying tributes up a chain of corporations to the corporation and owners at the top of the organization, you begin to see the world around you in a very different light, akin to the lives of the innocents who try to earn a living by selling goods at a local market and having the local mafia boss and his street thugs harassing you and making you pay a protection fee to keep them from coming back to break your legs and destroy your little shop and everything in it.

Anon 10:21pm, right on! And the immunity from prosecution doesn't stand, for one easy to understand reason, and possibly for a second, more complicated reason. the easily understood reason is, the very documents on which the criminals stand for judicial immunity declare that the immunity does not apply for actions which violate the oath of office, such as committing crimes against others and failing to voluntarily compensate the victims for their damages.

FreeDom

Freewill said...

Anon 12:31am,
refer to my response to your part 1, and recognize that you have ventured to make statements based on invalid assumptions. it's not wise to refer to someone else's words and acts and form judgements when you haven't witnessed the words and acts and have but partial details.
FreeDom

Anonymous said...

Yes, it makes sense. Thanks for replying to my comment.

Anonymous said...

The assumption I made was that he had to have a bond in order to pay.
And that the bond was paid for him to be free (at a cost)
That by paying, he entered into a contract.
That by entering into a new contract, that contract took the place of his 'first in time, first in right employment contract'.
And that I may know how that part works from first hand knowledge, not of FreeWill, but of others I am familiar with; who have taken the journey he is on.

Anonymous said...

NOT MUCH LONGER AND THEIR GOING.....

DOWN........ ENOUGH OF THESE STINKING MURDERING NAZIS PIGS....

Anonymous said...

Re Anon Oct 21, 2015, 12:34 AM
WHY WAS THIS POST REMOVED BY "A BLOG ADMINISTRATOR"?
The post is/was DEFINITELY RELEVANT to the subject of Freewill's detention, except for the reference to "the inhabitant"! Comprehended tu?

Olive Oyl said...

Initially have no idea - must have been something of concern. Submit again if you wish. I will look for it and review.

Anonymous said...

Okay, here's one.
They have not produced the contracts FreeWill is asking for.
FreeWill paid some money toward a contract that is a bit higher than what he paid.
Which means the account still exists, and the contract that created the account either exists or it doesn't.
If it exists, he can demand to see the contract in accordance with FDCPA (it's obvious he has paid a portion of a debt, and FDCPA should be relevant)
He can also send a debt validation letter, and regardless of what they send back, open a dispute with the CFPB with a copy of his letter uploaded, and a copy of what they sent to him. [they can never validate the debt, so they send spreadsheet - shi--t].
Once they get notice from CFPB of a dispute of the debt, lets see who rolls over on who to say who created it and what contract they used to create it.
If they won't produce the contracts to Freewill, they have to produce them to the CFPB.
How's that for thinking outside the box.
[no it doesn't matter that Freewill paid or entered a new contract...it's never over until it's over.
I saw reference once to someone liken their system to that movie Jumanji, once the game it starts, it goes and goes until the last roll, and someone wins and someone loses. Good movie, by the way.
CFPB is your friend. It makes them open books they won't open, it makes them reveal things we are trying to discover, and it pulls back the curtain to find out who's behind the transaction and how the debt got created.
The debt, bond, either exists, or it's a fiction and they are keeping him without a valid contract.
It's all business and contracts, imho

marie said...

FDCPA and CFPB stand for???

Olive Oyl said...

Morning Marie! I just sent a request for explanation! Will post as soon as receive response. If don't respond shortly, I will make a call. Blessings! Always love reading your comments! You are one GREAT AMERICAN!

Anonymous said...

Here's something that is FACTUAL, that is not based in emotional reaction, which is what you should all think about.


They may be Nazis, but at least they did not TORTURE Freewill. Freewill on his own volition, GAVE UP his rights by declaring himself to be a U.S. Citizen even when not true.


As a matter of fact, U.S. Citizens are cleverly disguised as "corporations" no different than the prosecuting attorney....thusly government thugs can do anything they want to them, and ransom them, and get away with it under the law. There is a method to the way they acted after all.


On the opposite hand, if you are a declared non resident alien and do NOT possess materials that show you are a U.S. Citizen.....then you are a NON Citizen which means you are a foreign national. At that point you have immunity.


Should this individual be thinking clearly, they should go to the "courts" and file their affidavit along with Tax form that declares their non-resident alien status...Unfortunately, many are not "SMART" enough to consider such things in great detail.


However it is the LAW, that if you are a non-resident alien and do not make salary as a U.S. Citizen.....Then most of the time, they cannot even talk to you in a court room at all. They would not even be allowed to see you in a court, because wisely, you would never enter their court room unless it was to provide proof of not being a U.S. Citizen.

At that point if they still hassled you, you could collect the evidence as usual and take it to your Jury to provide enough evidence to toss all of them in jail. I'm not saying you won't get a lot of these government crooks in jail through the method you are employing, you may well do that, but the most effective means to abolish them is actually to declare your NON -UNITED STATES status carte blanche and go after the people doing it with criminal claims until they all go down.

One after the other, one criminal claim against an employee turns to a hundred criminal claims against 100 individuals.....NOT corporations, since this claim process bankrupts the city faster than blinking an eye.

It may never work in major urban cities, but it cleans the kitchen sink in most western states with very little war and it also only works for those who are declared non resident aliens who aren't citizens of the UNITED STATES....

Anonymous said...

By the way, there are indeed reporting forms and even legal forms (with the USA INCs insignia, no less) that do report and prove by using them you are in fact not a Citizen of the U.S.A.

And they also do work well to the point you don't have any requirement for a green card......

marie said...

You are too nice...lol I appreciate that but the people who are taking the time to bring us info are greater Americans. I am also praying for the great Americans who are hopefully stepping up and Implementing that prososed war against the Khazarian Mafia. I cannot wait. That will be the best Christmas gift that we can ever hope to open.

Teepee said...

It seems to me that I read a few years ago that only those living in D.C. are U.S. citizens because that is where the corp. U.S. is housed. So that would mean all of us living in the different states are not legal citizens. Does anyone remember reading this? Or am I remembering incorrectly? Perhaps we all could declare ourselves "non-resident aliens".

Anonymous said...

An awareness blog, and someone didn't even google FDCPA or CFPB?
Wow. Like Wow.
Not legal advice
Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (your power) state and federal protections for we, the people.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the power behind your power to demand to know who is behind the contracts you are being forced or compelled to perform under), CFPB will enforce your right to demand to see the contracts that compel you to perform any act, or compel you to pay anyone, even if they are on your credit report, claiming that you owe them some purported debt. They have to validate, and they can't, and regardless of what they send you; it won't be a contract signed by both parties; and when they don't validate you complain to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
I read people writing the government is corrupt all the time, and sitting on their zzz's and playing pitiful me games, and then there are people who are making things happen. The ones sitting have no idea the changes are good or bad, they see changes they don't comprehend, so they presume bad.
The rest of us continue to make the changes and we participate in the solution and we access the remedies available to us.
People being indicted is because of people like us.
People being investigated is because of people like us.
The pitiful me crowd sits and reads what's going on, never the wiser, always clueless, calling everyone else sheeple, and haven't done a thing to 'help' make a difference.
It is your right to not do a single thing to make a single change.
I do not complain about those that do nothing, but I am aware of their existence when I read what they write.

The twitter and text generation and the I don't want to search, I want the information handed to me generation are their own future, and education is too much thinking, and reading, and doing. Doing something takes too much time; or may interfere with their comfort or lives, so they wait on someone else to do it so they can see, ( who love to watch - like galactics )

Next topic
As for the comment below, it is easy to not be a US Citizen, just stop putting yes on the contracts, and if you work, complete an I-9 that indicates you are a noncitizen national of the United States.
Unemployment still comes, jobs still hire, apartments still rent. Nothing really changes except your reality.
Immunity is as long as you don't harm anyone, so all the get a rope and keep the powder dry still have to 'self govern' their selves and their actions. On the Immigration and Naturalization Services website, there is an eVerify. Anyone can eVerify their status as a US Citizen, nonresident alien, noncitizen national of the United States at that site. The paperwork you provide is the same paperwork you have, so the only thing that changes is your status, and if you are working, you change it there. If that agency wants to see it, they can ask the employer for it. People have collected unemployment as noncitizen national of the United States, because they have the right to work as a state citizen, (same paperwork), you are born here, you have a right to work here, you are not illegal, you are just not a US Citizen.

marie said...

Teepee: Yes, I have read that too and it makes sense. For everyone to have to declare themselves a non-resident alien does not make sense. The corporation has overreached their jurisdiction and committed fraud by declaring us a corporation and therefore under their jurisdiction. However, instead of every man or woman one by one claiming not to be a U.S. Citizen, and since the corporation is at fault, it is the corporation who must be [forced] to understand their jurisdiction not the other way around.

Anonymous said...

This is total balogna, since in any of the states if you were born with a hospital birth certificate that automatically designates you a US citizen. The only way to disavow that is to file for separation.

marie said...

ANON 12:32: Whew! So birth certificates have been around since people were born? And...what did we do when there were no birth certificates? And...Social Security has been around forever?? What way of life do you think that we had before Lincoln came into office and they did away with the original 13th amendment and and brought in THE 14 AMENDMENT? What about the ACTs of 1871, 1913, 1933, 1945 and so on...All passed by a corporation. Which changed the FACT THAT WE ARE NOW UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS SINCE 1945? Look those up. THEY TOOK OVER UNDER FRAUD POSING AS OUR GOVERNMENT. Do you really think that it is feasible that every single man or woman one by one are going to disavow. If the majority does not DISAVOW the system still stands. So what is bologna? When someone has been brainwashed to believe that the system which was THRUST upon us WITHOUT OUR KNOWLEDGE, CONSENT OR PERMISSION is the system that should be. Research history when UNITED STATES, INC, did not exist and see what you come up with. That is the way of life we are supposed to have and THAT is what I was referring to when I said THEY MUST BE FORCED TO UNDERSTAND [THEIR] JURISDICTION. Simply repealing these Acts ARE A START butthen who controls the repeal? We do when we stand up. They are the Mafia so when they come in and take over (which is exactly what they did) are we supposed to live side by side with the Mafia who just keeps committing crimes? People act as if they are a government. They are a foreign corporation who came in and just took over. SO WHO HAS TO DISAVOW? NOT US!

marie said...

ANON 10:16: I apologize for not looking it up myself. Some Abbreviations have many different things coming up when you look them up depending on what you are talking about . I just thought that if someone who is as smart as you are proclaiming and you know that everyone else is dumber than you then you might have the forethought to clue us in.. . WOW! Just wow. sorry. What is BCC?

Teepee said...

Way to go Marie...looks like you got your point across to Anonymous 12:32...he/she allowed you to have the last word so perhaps Anonymous understands now.

Anonymous said...

ANY UPDATES ON THE KY CASE ?

Anonymous said...

Freewill is scheduled for a jury trial November 24th.

Anonymous said...

If he has justice on his side, he will be out in a couple of weeks.

Juries are citizens, and the history of jury trials goes back a long way. If the jury he is guilty, all the wailing on this site will not do him any good at all.

Anonymous said...

Justice is not on his side. The scales tilt but neither side of the scale is labeled.
If everyone could learn the history, that the birth certificate started it, yes. Did it make you a slave? No.
It did create a corporation with a name that you are called. That's why lose the name would kind of work and NOT, and some of the other things like UCC (dropping from representing the corporation) kind of works and NOT.
UCC is copyrighted, and when they want to enforce the copyright, [ie. you don't have permission to use UCC cause you are NOT the corporation], they will.
People win in the smaller battles cause they let them. A sort of Sun Tzu strategy of not showing all you have, only show enough to win the battle.
Enough rambling.
If people want to break out of this, they have to retrain their brain that there is no government. Sorry, but to get out you have to see the corporation with a president.
To break out of this, the people have to learn, there is not City or State government. Again, you have to see it's a corporation. If you have to do a Dunn and Bradstreet search or contact the local Secretary of State to find out what they have on filed for the creation of the City of or State of to wake up about the real things they are, then do it.
The birth certificate created a corporation using a name. The name is NOT you, the paper is not you, your mother did not sign you into slavery, if anything she helped them create it by witnessing its creation and verifying how she would spell the name you are called.
Christians, go into your bible. Stop letting your pastor be your teacher. Stop letting anyone be your teacher. Let them be your guide, and you decide which way you want to go. Go look at the birth of anyone in the bible, anyone. Does it say they named them or called them. Some bibles may have written name, but the ones I view wrote called. A sound, like the word, like in the beginning is the word. We are called, church people have a calling, when I get on the phone I call you. Called. In court, "Is your name Blazey Bee?" "I am called Blazey Bee." [not legal advice, but schools take attendance to call the name], supposedly the christ was asked if he name was "*****" and he did not accept the name. He knew what he was called.

Now that you know there is no government, then who are the people who run the government? Answer: People.
That's it. That's all they are.
You say, but they are rich?! and I Answer: "So." I answer again: "They are rich People." That's it. That's all that they are.
But you say, "They have power!" I answer, "What power have you seen?" "Have you seen them fly through the air, or lift tall boulders, or walk through walls, or save a life with their bare hands?"
But you say, "They have the power to arrest you and put you in jail for things." I say, "You have to know who they are." "Arrest requires a warrant, [research], without a warrant it is kidnap [ignore the word kid - it's to keep adults from using it out of pride - it is what it is - adults get kidnapped too - your pride will defeat you if you don't use words because you believe a word controls you]
Who is 'they'? Go figure that out. and don't come back with the name of any corporation or the name of any purported city, or the name of any purported state, or the name of any building.

Anonymous said...

After you figure out who 'they' is, you'll see you help them put you in bondage, and you believe everything you are told because you do not want to learn, and the system is to punish anyone who doesn't want to learn to stand up and self govern. The system, is tired of the mass illusion. The system is being rewritten to get harsher and harsher and harsher, until you either wake up and see it, or you get consumed by it, and sit in FEMA or jail, or some other place you WILL be taken.
Guess what? YOU did not open your eyes to figure out who 'they' is. They is not a business. They is a man. They is a woman. Nothing more. Can a man make you a slave without a contract?
Can a woman make you a slave without a contract?
People don't tell you anything, they say, come here, sit there, walk over here, stop, go, jump, crawl, and you do it cause you see them as 'they', and you believe 'they have power'. You never see the contract that says what you do for them is real power. It is not.
You did it of your free will. If you don't want to see how the man or the woman got the power, then you are doing it of your free will.

Not doing something of your free will takes time.
You have been trained to attach to the outside. Attach to friends, or family, or your home, or your reputation.
Christians know they are supposed to have their house in order at all times for when they are called away, they are not needed.
But do they do it, that's why certain people can't stand to deal with them, they do not practice what they push heavily onto others.
You have to have all the time in the world to do the work of your God when called, or turn in your dancing shoes and sit down and shut up.

People have defeated the system but not in a week or a month, cause you have to not participate for a long time to make them let you go.
You do not give them the contracts they do not have. You do not help them create the paperwork of power over you by hiring them to re present you to other people as a name on paper instead of who you really are, someone who is ''called' and don't need a piece of paper to call you, just say 'the word'. You do not fund their system, and help them hurt you and others. You stop pretending they are more than they are.
You see them for who they are, and say 'NO'.
You research, because I don't give legal advice cause I do not mess with their world.
I live in mine, and mine is not legal, it is self governed with natural law and harmony.
Be well.
When the court stops moving, the last place Freewill is, will be the last place he will be moved.
they need our energy to move, "ie Motion for" "Motion to" "Charge"
A jury has a contract with someone else.
Where is their contract with 'you' to be your peer? They are strangers to you, are they not?
Where it the contract with whoever selects them to make them your peers?
They will sit Freewill before them, and ask him to choose from them. His gestures will create
contracts of gesture that they are his peers and not strangers, and that they can judge him.
Will Free will participate in those gestures too?
Every step, every move, every thought has to do with what is next.
Freewill so far is moving 'with' them. He has someone representing, and he has paid, and he has signed.
And he doesn't know 'who' has any of the money he paid, or who wanted that paper signed. But he did it anyway,
cause 'They' told him. He never figured out who is 'they' and why 'they' have power.
This is an awareness blog.
This is only opinion.

Anonymous said...

Re: [Anonymous October 15, 2015 at 7:41 PM (on the "Update on Freewill" thread, not this "Update on Freewill and His Legal Fight" thread)
Please inform we-the-people why Freewill has been arrested/detained/kidnapped against his will. What are the (alleged) charges/violations-of-the-law that precipitated his incarceration. I have reviewed the postings of 9/13/15, 9/23/15, 9/24/15, 9/25/15, and find no explanation of his kidnapping, that I can understand.
Please help me/us understand this situation. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?]

The above request/post HAS NOT been answered as far as I can understand. There have been some responses, but nothing of substance that answers the question(s) asked.
It would be greatly appreciated if the Moderator(s) would answer directly the questions put forth, given that "Freewill", "JD", whoever, allegedly is scheduled for a jury trial on Nov 24, as posted by:
[Anonymous, October 28, 2015 at 8:37 PM:
Freewill is scheduled for a jury trial November 24th.]
Inquiring minds would like to know Whiskey Tango Hotel.

This posting is in response to:
Olive Oyl, October 23, 2015 at 5:33 PM
Initially have no idea - must have been something of concern. Submit again if you wish. I will look for it and review.

Anonymous said...

Suggest you read thoroughly the two posts normally found toward the top two posts on the main page.

Anonymous said...

I read the two posts and at most saw the following:

There is no, I repeat, NO injured party to have filed the present claims against Freewill. The "charges" against Freewill, in absence of an injured party, are mere CLAIMS against him, claims under maritime law, claims which are unlawfull and constitute fraud; it doesn't matter what the "charges" are if no victim exists, be they motor vehicle code violations (as in Freewill's ongoing cases)

But many want to know if the thing that people hold and want to have revalue has anything to do with Freewill.
I think the posts that mention the currency word by name, are deleted, but I am not sure.

The confusion is, the posts at the top, opening the subject with an update, makes clear the corporate structure is defacto, bankrupt, and has nothing on freewill, not even contracts, and then alludes to freewill contracting for a bond of $5000.

later is says:
The agents decreased their ransom demands when it became apparent that Freewill would not submit to them and their liability for false imprisonment was quickly racking up into the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. Freewill's friends paid enough of the demanded amount ...

Freewill had to agree with the contract his friends made for him, they would not let him out 'unbound' to them.

Freewill's friends want to keep the charges/claims against Freewill private except to mention the travel. Locking out the people on this blog, as if his very public arrest is private, only prevents those that may have the information he needs or can use from giving it to him.
A sort of, you keep me in the dark, I keep you in the dark.

But remember, freewill has the best there is taking care of him, so we should not be concerned because the best will take care of everything - from posts I've read on this and the other update.

Personally, the road out of that place is very narrow.
The only people that can 'show him the way' are the people that have been there, they are communicating here but no one hears them because what they say doesn't sound like what people 'know'.

Well, maybe you don't know cause you never trecked across The Never Never [making reference to that harsh land in the movie, Australia, 2008] and made it out.

They are not going to answer you.
That's the answer.
If they do, they are only going to tell you what you already see.
They think they are protecting Freewill but not disclosing anything he hasn't approved of having revealed.
Freewill has made his decisions and will have to live with them, including if his decision is to not reveal things that others can use to help him.

It is his journey. We will respect his decisions, even if they keep someone from helping by not knowing everything we could be told, right?

Anonymous said...

The Power of Love ...

Anonymous said...

What name/subject would you suggest should be specifically searched for?
Inquiring minds would appreciate being informed.

Anonymous said...

So ..... you can't leave well enough alone, allow the legal beagles to do their job and publish when they are ready? My my ..... you DO have an interesting nose for 'information'. Why not do some reading somewhere and keep yourself occupied rather than nosing in others business.

Anonymous said...

EXCUSE MY IGNORANCE... but somewhere I think I read that courts "make money" by postponing cases that are scheduled, many often repeatedly. Is it true that they "make" money, and if so, how? Can someone please explain this to me in simple terms if it is true and if it is not, just say so??? Thank you in advance.

marie said...

Look up Rod Class on Talk shoe. He will be able to help you understand.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Marie, for taking the time to respond. I'll check it out. Thanks, again.

Anonymous said...

Courts make money as soon as they get the social security number.
People wonder why illegals are not in jail, and I would opinion, there is no account to pilfer if they have no social security number.
Money is made at birth and death using the certificates of birth and death and the social security number.

As for how to defeat them, it's simple and hard.
Hard because people have been told the 'past', and they are stuck in the past.
You tell them their mom signed them into slavery as a baby, and they believe they are slaves all the way in their adult life. They can't think past the fact that once they are no longer a minor, all decisions are their own, and their parents aren't signing forms for them anymore.
They are signing forms now, and the control real or perceived from their youth and school years are over.
You tell them the pope wrote a canon saying he owns all property and souls on the planet. They get stuck.
They don't wonder why a man who speaks for the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth would write a document to 'steal ownership' from the Creator he speaks for. People assume the man has the power, when the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth could have created man first, then given man the power to create the Heavens and the Earth, and the man could own all the property and souls on it. Now why do you think it was not in that order? Because the spark of the Creator is given to EVERY man, so no man can own another without his consent. Pope owns a piece of paper with words, and it controls all that agree to be controlled by words or deeds to him. People like me, know better!
Courts can hurry up and move Freewill away from the rest of us, so we will 'supposedly' stop what we are doing that interferes with their control.
We won't stop protecting our rights.
Love has always been the key.
They love the haters and the fighters. You are right up their alley.
To hate, or fight, that energy feeds them and makes them stronger than you cause they are feeding off that energy off you.
Who would fight an enemy and feed him to make him stronger at the same time? That's kind of stupid, but people are set in their ways.
First thing they do is go zero to 60 on someone to 'tell them off', or to show them their place. Well believe me, you are feeding them and they love you.
Rod didn't contract and was kidnapped, he kept getting kidnapped and he filed complaints, then one day they kidnapped him and he got 'concerned'. So he sat down and contracted with them. The sealed everything he did, wiped out all his complaints on him because now they had a contract, and ignored his demands from that point on.
He contracted because he valued his health more than he valued his free spirit/soul. Sometimes to exist in the body/physical, people will bargain their soul. I have no personal info on Rod Class nor Freewill.

Anonymous said...

Why are BAR members foreign nationals? Do the US Constitution and US Law address the matter of foreign nationals operating on US territory? Please give us regular readers an Olive Oyl "verdict". Thank you.

Anonymous said...

All BAR members who exist take an oath to a private foreign corporation in London. They are never asked to take an oath to anything else, and if you notice they pledge loyalty to United States.

United States is of course a defunct, foreign corporation. So to that end, every action they take can be seen as illegitimate and are not based upon either the laws or facts of the united states. You should learn this fact of history well and soon, as it proves the entire Federal government is a illegitimate.

Anonymous said...

All BAR members should either be deported or put a rope around their neck. It's called the 13th Amendment

Anonymous said...

I have a friend who has been plundered and locked up for over a year on false defacto charges they called telephonic harassment for calling public officials to request and demand public record which to this day has never received. He has recently got on record the proof and evidence of how corrupt these public officials are concerning their crimes against the people, http://www.powerteams.in/richard-koenig-stimies-beverton-city-council-2/

The corruption and scum runs deep and high throughout this giant slave plantation we call a country. I am putting my money into a rope manufacturing company and expect to be financially set up by next years end.

Anonymous said...

06-01-2018 DEF IN CUSTODY RE: FTA JURY TRIAL
06-01-2018 WAIVED ATTORNEY
06-01-2018 GUILTY-PLED
06-01-2018 DEFT CONSENTS TO JUDGE KELLY FOR PLEA
06-01-2018 A. POBANZ #7525 ON THE RECORD
06-04-2018 ARRAIGNED 06-01-2018
06-04-2018 SENTENCING 09-12-2018
06-05-2018 POSTED BOND
06-05-2018 POSTED:06/01/18--PR BOND

So, he pleaded guilty, what a wimp.

When danger reared its ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes Brave Sir Destry turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat.

Brave, brave, brave, brave Sir Destry.