Saturday, February 20, 2016

MEXICO IS ANGRY A MUST READ

MEXICO IS ANGRY
A MUST READ.

Wait Until Trump Makes Them Pay for the Fence ! ! ! !

Mexico is angry...

Wow! And make certain you read, at the bottom of this page, the part that says it will take 30 more seconds to read! Please forward to all you know and ask them to forward to all they know.

The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora, Mexico do not like it. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's almost funny. The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico!

The state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona's new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico. It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona's new 'Employer Sanctions Law' will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora (Arizona's southern neighbor) made up of mostly of small towns - cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.

The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States . Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business license. The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government instead of ours.

'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales . 'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona ,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their hometowns in Sonora without jobs,' she said 'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona.

Wrong! The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico, and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico's citizens. It's time for the Mexican government, and its citizens, to stop feeding parasitically off the United States and to start taking care of its/their own needs.

Too bad that other states within the USA don't pass a law just like that passed by Arizona. Maybe that's the answer, since our own Congress will do nothing!

*New Immigration Laws*
Be sure to read to the bottom or you will miss the message...
1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or any other government assistance programs. Any who are a burden will be deported.
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8. If foreigners come here and buy land, their options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
9. Foreigners may have NO protests; NO demonstrations, NO waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, NO bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted and, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
Too strict? The above laws are the current immigration laws of MEXICO ! If it's good for Americans to obey Mexican laws, then it's good vice versa!!!

This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on. An idea whose time has come: Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come. Have each person contact a minimum of twenty people on their address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.

In three days, most people in The United States of America will have read the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.

You are one of my 20. If you don't have twenty, pass it on to whatever number you can!

"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

Montanans say "NO!" to muslim 'refugees'


Residents of Ravalli County in western Montana protest against plans to bring Syrian refugees to their state last Thursday. Photo/The Missoulian

Hundreds pack meeting – demand 'no refugees' in Montana

Obama plan to bring muslim migrants draws fierce opposition


Leo Hohmann
Feb 19 2016

To see more than 500 people at a 'government' meeting usually means one of two things – a major tax hike is on the agenda or something akin to a nuclear waste dump is being proposed. 

So what was it that had the townspeople of rural Ravalli County, Montana, so stirred up?  The answer is simple: Syrian muslim refugees.  They don’t want any.

The county held a public hearing Feb. 18 on a proposed letter to be sent to the Obama administration.  Montana Gov. Steve Bullock and the state’s congressional delegation made one point abundantly clear – no Syrian muslim refugees will be welcomed in Ravalli County.  The county commissioners voted unanimously to send the letter.

Many people who could not make it to the meeting had called or wrote their commissioners. Commission Chairman Ray Hawk said the content of those calls and letters was 50-to-1 in opposition to allowing refugees to be resettled in Ravalli County, the Missoulian reported.

A few people spoke in favor of welcoming refugees to Ravalli saying they were embarrassed by the tone of the meeting. They were booed and heckled, the newspaper reported.

The pushback was sparked by an announcement recently by two nonprofits (?? FEMA cooperatives) – Soft Landing Montana and WorldMontana – that they plan to work with the 'federal government' to bring Syrian refugees to Big Sky Country. The plan is to resettle the Syrians in the Helena area and in Missoula County, a neighboring county to the north of Ravalli County.

As WND reported last month, the Obama administration is increasingly sending muslim refugees to smaller cities in Middle America.

Wyoming and Montana are the two exceptions. Wyoming is the only state that does not participate in the federal refugee program. Montana has not received any refugees since 2009 and only 61 have been sent there since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, mostly from Belarus.

98 percent of Syrian refugees are muslim

So when news broke that a plan was afoot to bring Syrian refugees, 98 percent of whom are Sunni muslim to the western rancher state, it set off alarm bells for many residents. They held a protest rally on the Missoula County courthouse steps Feb. 8 that attracted 120 people in a blowing snow storm. They have sent op-ed articles to local newspapers questioning the wisdom of the Missoula County Board of Commissioners, which in a letter last month requested that Obama’s State Department send their county “approximately 100 refugee per year."

It was against that backdrop that Thursday’s public hearing in Ravalli County was held.


The 'federal government' is working with churches and NGOs to bring foreign refugees, including some from Syria, to the small towns of Helena and Missoula.
(Most likely these 'churches' are 501(c)3 partners with FEMA, following FEMA orders to integrate the muslims in to the communities, mixing muslims with the heavy Christian population in Montana for the pending muslim slaughter of Christians.)
 


Interest was so high that the meeting had been moved three times to accommodate the ever-growing crowd. It was eventually decided to hold the meeting in the gymnasium of a local junior high school.

The crowd erupted in a standing ovation when the unanimous vote came down in favor of sending the letter.

Caroline Solomon, who lives in Flathead County near Kalispell in northwestern Montana is a member of the Montana chapter of ACT for America, a group that educates the public about the dangers of creeping Islamic supremacism in Western cultures.

What happened in Ravalli County was huge, she said.
“They did it on their own,” Solomon said. “They did a draft letter, and it’s unbelievable what happened yesterday.  They accepted the letter, signed the letter, and they’re sending it in.”

The same trend of people “waking up” is also seen in the growing crowds coming to Act for America meetings, Solomon said.  Paul Nachman, a retired physicist and immigration expert from Bozeman, will speak about muslim refugee resettlement at the next meeting of Act for America on Tuesday.

Montana and Wyoming - the last frontier?

“We had to move it to a bigger location. I think people are waking up and realizing that Wyoming and Montana, we’re the only ones still standing (against the refugee influx),” Solomon said.

Neighboring Idaho has become a hotspot for refugees in recent years, taking in nearly 11,000 since the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

Even Alaska has been sent 1,130 refugees, including more than 500 from Muslim countries, over that same period according to U.S. government data.

Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat, has supported Obama’s plans to bring in 10,000 Syrians and 85,000 refugees from all countries this year, followed by 100,000 in fiscal 2017.  (Past time for this communist traitor governor to be gone.)

According to a NBC-13 News poll conducted Feb. 18th, 93 percent of Montanans who participated said they were against resettling any Syrian refugees in Montana.
"And the opposition is only growing as people learn about the refugee program", Solomon told WND.

“It is grassroots. It cannot be more grassroots than those people showing up in Ravalli County and doing their civic duty,” she said. “We will see what happens. We’re not giving up in Montana."

Those who spoke at the Ravalli County meeting were not in a mood for compromise.

Hollis Poe of Hamilton told the commission he was starting a new group called Advancing Conservatism.
“ISIS will come after our women,” he said, as quoted by the Missoulian. “They are going to find that, in Ravalli County, women pack weapons."

Phil Liggins, also of Hamilton, said allah and the God of the Bible were not the same.  “The U.S. may not be at war with islam, but islam is at war with the U.S.,” he said.

Commissioner Jeff Burrows said in the end the decision came down to economics.  “We heard loud and clear that people were concerned about impacts to the economy and infrastructure,” Burrows said. “From the commissioners’ point of view, this wasn’t about race or religion. This was about impacts to local services and impacts to public health, safety and welfare in Ravalli County.

‘Pockets of resistance’ forming across U.S.

Ann Corcoran, who has been following refugee resettlement for nine years as a blogger at Refugee Resettlement Watch, said she has never seen so much interest in the issue as she is seeing now.  “Pockets of resistance” are popping up across the country, fueled by news of terror attacks by Muslim refugees in Paris, France, in November and by a husband and wife duo in San Bernardino in December. The wife in the latter attack, Tashfeen Malik, came to the U.S. as an immigrant on a fiancĂ©e visa from Saudi Arabia. The visa screening system failed, just as the refugee screening system has allowed dozens of terrorists into the country from Somalia, Iraq, Uzbekistan and Bosnia", Corcoran said.

More than 30 refugees from Somalia alone have left the country since 2007 to fight for overseas terror organizations, the FBI reports.  And FBI Director James Comey said in congressional testimony last October it was impossible to screen the vast majority of Syrian refugees because the U.S. has no access to reliable law enforcement data in that war-torn country.

Meanwhile, Syrians are arriving daily

After the Paris attacks, more than two dozen governors wrote the Obama administration and requested that no Syrians be sent to their states until they can be properly vetted. The administration ignored those requests and the Syrians continue to arrive daily in dozens of U.S. cities and towns.

Just since Nov. 1 of last year, the Obama administration has delivered 721 Syrian refugees to the U.S., according to the federal refugee database.  That boosts to 2,761 the number of Syrians who have been sent to the U.S. since the outbreak of that country’s civil war almost five years ago.

The top 10 states for Syrian refugee arrivals to date are:
  1. California: 316
  2. Michigan: 287
  3. Texas: 276
  4. Pennsylvania: 205
  5. Illinois: 195
  6. Arizona: 183
  7. Florida: 165
  8. Kentucky: 112
  9. Ohio: 106
  10. New Jersey: 99
Corcoran said citizen backlash does make a difference on where the refugees will be sent by government contractors posing as “charities.”  “The U.S. State Department has repeatedly said it will not send refugees to ‘unwelcoming’ communities,” Corcoran said. “But, it isn’t because of their concern for you, your economy and your culture, it is because they fear for the refugees’ safety."

That was borne out last September in comments by Larry Bartlett, a State Department official, while speaking in Twin Falls, Idaho. Bartlett said in that meeting that the feds don’t send refugees to places where they could be “unsafe,” which Corcoran described as a “slap in the face” by a cynical 'government' bureaucrat who would insinuate that because a community didn’t want muslim refugees that they would actually hurt them physically.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/hundreds-pack-meeting-demand-no-refugees-in-montana/

Bride Gets Instant Dose Of Islam



New Bride Gets Instant Dose Of Islam After Teasing Groom With Piece Of Cake


A disturbing video uploaded to Facebook on Wednesday showed a just-wed Muslim man slapping his new bride across the face for daring to play a tiny prank on him.

Little information was provided regarding the source of the video, but comments from the poster indicated that the video was of a newlywed Muslim couple, though no date or location was indicated.

In the video, the Muslim man could be sitting sitting by his wife. A moment later, he used his finger to scoop up a piece from a cake his wife was holding. As he brought his finger close to her face, so as to feed her some cake, she quickly pulled it out of his finger and fed herself. She obviously meant to do that in jest, but the Muslim man apparently took offense to it, as he then forcefully slapped her across the face.  


(If this woman was smart, she should have immediately called for help, asked for police protection, and annulled this 'marriage.' This would be only the beginning leading to tragedy for her in the end.)

 Muslim Scholar on How to Beat Your Wife
Step by Step - Part 1

  


“And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath,” it reads in regard to how a man should treat his wife.

It continues:

“Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.”

Allah is great and women are not — and therein lies all any civilized man or woman needs to know about the tenets of radical Islam.

http://conservativetribune.com/new-bride-dose-of-islam/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=MailChimp&utm_content=featured-stories&utm_campaign=DailyEmail02.20.16&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Conservative%20Tribu ne%20-%20Conservat ive%20Brief%202192016&utm_content=Conservative%20Tribune%20-%20Conservative%20Brief%202192016+CID_73ccad4688c2f85
74a89c1228cd37c08&utm_source=CampaignMonitor&utm_term=PHOTO%20New%20Bride%20Gets%20Istant%20Dose% 20Of%20Islam%20After%20Teasing%20Groom%20With%20Piece%20Of%20Cake

A Russian Grandma's Advice to Obama


A RUSSIAN GRANDMA'S 
ADVICE TO OBAMA

This video is wildly popular on the Russian internet.

A Russian babushka (grandma) gives Obama advice in rhyme! in the best Russian tradition.

She calls him Obamashka, an affectionate rendering of his name in Russian.

She offers to pray for him, to cook him blinis (pancakes), to take him to church to meet her priest so that they can all pray for America together, and advises against cozying up to Nazis, explaining that this always ends up badly.  (Imagine that one!  bozo is in the middle of the nazis!)

She explains that Crimea is Russian and always fought on Russia's side.

Finally she urges him to make friends with Volodya (affectionate name for Vladimir), and wishes him well.

We are Russia experts and we can assure you there is no force on earth that can withstand the charm and goodness of the Russian babushka.


Spoken in Russian with use of English subtitles



JOE, YOU COULD DO SOMETHING USEFUL ..............



JOE, YOU COULD DO SOMETHING USEFUL .......


 
A  retired guy sits around the house all day so one day his wife says, “Joe, you could do something useful, like vacuum the house once a week”.  
 
The guy gives it a moment’s thought and says; “sure why not.  Show me to the vacuum.”  
 
Half an hour later, the guy comes into the kitchen to get some coffee.  
 
His wife says, “I didn't hear the vacuum working, I thought you were using it?”  
 
Exasperated, Joe answers, ”The stupid thing is broken, it won't start. We need to buy a new one.”   
 
“Really,” she says, “show me - it worked fine the last time” 
 
So he did  


 Just sayen’ …


STATES AND WHAT MAKES EACH OF THEM FAMOUS


STATES AND WHAT MAKES 
EACH OF THEM FAMOUS

What was the most notable contribution of each 50 states of the USA....
 
ALABAMA. . . . . .Was the first state to have 9-1-1, started in 1968.
 

 
ALASKA. . . . . .One out of every 64 people has a pilot's license.

ARIZONA. . . . . .Is the only state in the continental U. S. that does not follow Daylight Savings Time.
ARKANSAS. . . . . .Has the only active diamond mine in the US.

CALIFORNIA. . . . . .Its economy is so large that if it were a country, it would rank seventh in the entire world. 
COLORADO. . . . . .In 1976 it became the only state to turn down the Olympics. 
CONNECTICUT. . . . . .The Frisbee was invented here at Yale University.
 

DELAWARE. . . . . .Has more scientists and engineers than any other state.


FLORIDA. . . . . . At 874.3 square miles, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US.

GEORGIA. . . . . .It was here in 1886 that pharmacist John Pemberton made the first vat of Coca-Cola.... interesting!

HAWAII. . . . . .Hawaiians live, on average, five years longer than residents of any other state.

IDAHO. . . . . .TV was invented in Rigby, Idaho, in 1922.

ILLINOIS. . . . . .Has one governor in jail, one pending jail, and is the most corrupt state in the union!

INDIANA. . . . . . Home to Santa Claus, Indiana, which gets a half million letters for Santa every year.

IOWA. . . . . .Winnebago R. V. s get their name from Winnebago County. Also, it is the only state name that begins with 2 vowels.
 

KANSAS. . . . . .Liberal, Kansas has an exact replica of the house in "The Wizard of Oz."


KENTUCKY. . . . . .Has more than $6 billion in gold underneath Fort Knox. 

LOUISIANA. . . . . .Has parishes instead of counties because they were originally Spanish church units.

MAINE. . . . . .It is so large that it covers as many square miles as the other five New England states combined.

MARYLAND. . . . . .The Ouija board was created in Baltimore in 1892. Bet you didn't know that!

MASSACHUSETTS. . . . . .The Fig Newton is named after Newton, Massachusetts.
 

MICHIGAN. . . . . .Fremont, home to Gerber, is the baby food capital of the world.
 
MINNESOTA. . . . . .The Mall of America in Bloomington is so big that if you spent 10 minutes in each store, you would be there almost four days.

MISSISSIPPI. . . . . President Teddy Roosevelt refused to shoot a bear here - that's how the teddy bear got its name!
MISSOURI. . . . . .Is the birth place of the ice cream cone.

MONTANA. . . . . .A sapphire from Montana is in the Crown Jewels of England.
NEBRASKA. . . . . .More triplets are born here than in any other state.
                                  NEVADA...... known as the 'silver state' due to the                                           importance of silver in its history and economy                                                    
NEW HAMPSHIRE. . . . . Birthplace of Tupperware, invented in 1938 by Earl Tupper.

NEW JERSEY. . . . . .Has the most shopping malls in one area in the world.
 

NEW MEXICO. . . . . .Smokey the Bear was rescued from a 1950 forest fire here.


NEW YORK. . . . . .Is home to the nation's oldest cattle ranch, started in 1747 in Montauk. Are you surprised?

NORTH CAROLINA. . . . . Home of the first Krispy Kreme doughnut.

NORTH DAKOTA. . . . . .Rigby, North Dakota, is the exact geographic center of North America.

OHIO. . . . . .The hot dog was invented here in 1900.

OKLAHOMA. . . . . .The grounds of the state capital are covered by operating oil wells.

OREGON. . . . . .Has the most ghost towns in the country.

PENNSYLVANIA. . . . . .The  smiley :) was first used in 1980 by computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University.
 

RHODE ISLAND. . . . . .The nation's oldest bar, the White Horse Tavern, opened here in 1673.


SOUTH CAROLINA. . . . . Sumter County is home to the world's largest gingko farm.

SOUTH DAKOTA. . . . . .Is the only state that has never had an earthquake.

TENNESSEE. . . . . .Nashville's Grand Ole Opry is the longest running live radio show in the world. (I wouldn't know - I'm not that old yet.)

TEXAS. . . . . .Dr. Pepper (a substitute for blood when in need! haha!) was invented in Waco in 1885. The hamburger was invented in Arlington in 1906.

UTAH. . . . . .The first Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant opened here in 1952.

VERMONT. . . . . .Montpelier is the only state capital without a McDonald's.

VIRGINIA. . . . . .Home of the world's largest office building, the Pentagon.

WASHINGTON. . . . . .Seattle has twice as many college graduates as any other state.

WASHINGTON, D. C. . . . . . .Is the first planned capital in the world.

WEST VIRGINIA. . . . . .Had the world's first brick paved street, Summers Street, laid in Charleston in 1870.

WISCONSIN. . . . . . The ice cream sundae was invented here in 1881 to get around Blue Laws prohibiting ice cream from being sold on Sunday. Also, the American Water Spaniel was created there and is the state dog.
 

WYOMING.. . . . . .Was the first state to allow women to vote.


 And now you know the rest of the story!!

Hope you enjoyed this. It just proves that no matter how old you are, you can still learn something new.

FCC Commissioner: First Amendment in Danger


FCC COMMISSIONER:  FIRST AMENDMENT IN DANGER!


17 Feb 2016
shawn


According to FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, the concept of free speech – so vital to the foundations of American democracy – is under assault by liberals who want to curtail any opinions that go against what they believe.

Pai, who has consistently fought to limit the FCC’s ability to censor online content, said there is a cultural shift occurring that could have disastrous ramifications for the future of American discourse. In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Pai said, “I think that poses a special danger to a country that cherishes First Amendment speech, freedom of expression, even freedom of association."

Pai went on to say that the tone at America’s universities was an omen of problems to come. “Largely what we’re seeing, especially on college campuses, is that if my view is in the majority and I don’t agree with your view, then I have the right to shout you down, disrupt your events, or otherwise suppress your ability to get your voice heard,” he said.

Pai said that it was a mistake to put too much faith in the Constitution. “The text of the First Amendment is enshrined in our Constitution, but there are certain cultural values that undergird the amendment that are critical for its protections to have actual meaning,” Pai said. “If that culture starts to wither away then so, too, will the freedom that it supports."

That cultural erosion has already begun. According to a November Pew Research poll, 40% of millennials believe the government should be able to prevent people from making statements which are “offensive to minority groups.” In Europe, which appears to be where many of these millennials would prefer to live, so-called “hate speech” laws are already being used to silence anti-refugee opinions.

Private companies like Twitter and Facebook are in solidarity, cracking down on speech they deem offensive. The problem, of course, is who gets to determine which statements are “hate speech” and which aren’t. No statement is universally offensive. No statement is universally inoffensive. Furthermore, who gets to hide under the protection of “minority group” status? Is there a theoretical future where no one can criticize a female politician without risking a fine?

It’s sad to see that this generation, which grew up taking the free and open internet for granted, now believes that it’s more important to protect feelings than it is to protect ideas. Ideas, if they are good ones, can thrive even when there is loud opposition. That millennials have so eagerly embraced censorship could be a sign of just how terrible their political ideas are.

Not that we needed another one. 

http://unfilteredpatriot.com/fcc-commissioner-first-amendment-in-danger/ 
 

Electronic Stun Devices 101


Electronic Stun Devices 101: What They Can and Cannot Do


|


Because of the increasing popularity of Electronic Stun Devices that are being marketed by reputable and sometimes not-so-reputable manufacturers, I decided that it was time for a bit of a reality check.

Electronic Stun Devices (including the TASER) can be an important part of a layered personal defensive system. However, not all ESDs are created equal, and they all have been endowed with capabilities via Hollywood that are far beyond what they can do in real life.

The first time I ever saw a TASER device depicted by Hollywood was in the 1976 Dirty Harry movie The Enforcer. In the movie, the mayor of San Francisco is kidnapped by a group of terrorists and shot with an early (and very ineffective) model of the TASER while in his limousine. The mayor is rendered unconscious for a considerable period of time and has to be assisted out of the car by the terrorists several minutes later because he is still groggy.

Nothing could be farther from the truth in terms of even modern TASER capabilities. No Electronic Stun Device incapacitates anyone for that length of time. But Hollywood is never one to let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Electronic Stun Devices can be broken down into two basic types: Contact Stun Devices (CSDs) and Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs). CEWs are best exemplified by the TASER.  

CSDs are the less expensive of the two types, with various models available advertising astronomical voltage levels (sometime 500,000 volts or more) in the $20 and higher price range. In a CSD, the voltage is delivered between two fixed probes at the end of the device. The sparking display is usually very impressive.

There is a loud crackle as the current arcs between the probes and the smell of ozone is detectable in the air. The psychological impact of the arcing current on a would-be attacker can provide a deterrent effect. After all, no one wants to be electrically shocked, even if it’s just by static electricity generated by feet scuffing across a carpet.  But a CSD’s capabilities are limited.

In the mid-1980s, a company named NOVA marketed its 50,000-volt CSD to law enforcement agencies, claiming that it could take down an aggressive opponent if held in the area of the suspect’s solar plexus and discharged for three to five seconds.

Both the Licking County and Franklin County (Ohio) Sheriff’s Offices issued them to their deputies and jailers. I frequently talked with the deputies who had been issued them. I wanted to see how effective they were, thinking they might be good tools for our agency (Reynoldsburg P.D.) to adopt as well.

No one I had talked to ever told me that either he or she, or anyone he or she knew who was issued one, was able to incapacitate anyone with the NOVA Stun Gun. They were withdrawn from service after five or so years. What the application of the NOVA device mainly did was make resistive suspects angrier, and there were two good reasons why.

First, five seconds is a long time in a fight with a violent, resisting subject. They are normally thrashing and moving about so violently that the odds of making and keeping contact with a CSD for that amount of time are very slim.

Second, even under the best of circumstances, chances of true temporary incapacitation with a CSD are remote. The electricity travels a very short distance from probe to probe and only along the surface of the skin. The delivery of localized pain is normally the only thing that CSDs do.
But CSDs are not a total loss for use by civilians.

When CSDs were issued to law enforcement, they were issued for the purpose of capturing resistive suspects—not driving them away. For civilians, the mission of the CSD is to drive attackers away, either through fear of being shocked or from the pain of a delivered shock. However unlike CSDs, CEWs can produce actual temporary incapacitation.

CEWs (like TASERs) deliver their electrical charge through fine wires attached to harpoon-like probes that spread apart at a rate of around 6 inches for every 3 feet traveled. The electrical current from a TASER (50,000 volts) can affect a much larger area of the body than the fixed probes of a CSD. The current is delivered below the skin, capable of affecting muscle tissue and causing temporary neuromuscular incapacitation in addition to pain. The temporary neuromuscular incapacitation (where you can’t think anything other than “make it stop” and can’t move) only lasts while the TASER is discharging.

The law enforcement TASERs discharge for only five seconds, while the civilian TASERs discharge for 30 seconds, allowing plenty of time for the defender to get away from the attacker. I can personally attest that a five-second TASER “ride” seems like an eternity. I can’t imagine a 30 second one. Once the current stops, recovery time ranges from immediately to five-10 seconds—not several minutes.

One CEW downside is the fact that both probes must strike the attacker and complete the electrical circuit. However, should you miss, any TASER can be used as a contact stun device. There is a price to pay for this level of effectiveness compared to a CSD: $299 for the TASER C2, and $399.00 for the new TASER Pulse (www.taser.com).

Like any self-defense device (including firearms), there are limitations to Electronic Stun Devices, whether they are CSDs or CEWs. If you decide to obtain one, make sure that you don’t purchase the very cheapest model from a company you’ve never heard of. Also, be familiar with state and local laws governing their possession and use before purchase, as they are not legal in every state and locale.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/ 

 

A World Without Borders - Truth about the 'United Nations'


A WORLD WITHOUT BORDERS 
UN STYLE


Rick_CCR_Article_2-19-16
 
 
|


If blue-helmeted UN peacekeepers show up in your town or village and offer to 'protect' you, RUN!  Or else get a weapon."

That is not a quote from some “Get the U.S. out of the UN” member of the John Birch Society. Not recklessly spit out by some isolationist who wants to build more nuclear weapons, fortify the borders, hunker down in Fortress America and, in the process, abandon the world to take care of itself.

The quote, attributed to 1996, is from Andrew Thomson, a medical doctor originally from New Zealand. He wrote it after serving mankind in several of the world’s most desperate, miserable places: Cambodia, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti and Rwanda.

Thomson developed lasting friendships with two other young people—Heidi Postlewait, a New York social worker, and Kenneth Cain, a New York attorney—and they documented their decade of work for the United Nations in a book published in 2004: Emergency Sex – and other desperate measures. The book, despite its title, is not about sex. Instead, it chronicles the lives of idealistic young people who volunteer—doctors, lawyers, secretaries—for UN Peacekeeping missions, doing good work under absolutely horrific conditions.

They witnessed the horrors of the 
-  Cambodian killing fields (a million murders); 
-  the rape of thousands of women by blue-helmeted UN 'Peacekeepers', usually men from Pakistan or Nigeria or some other God-forsaken place; 
-  the Hutu massacre of a million Tutsi in Rwanda, mostly with machetes and sharpened sticks; 
-  the ambush of UN convoys in Somalia when UN managers took bribes to betray a food convoy’s route; 
the cowardice of U.S. politicians who abandoned, to torture and death, thousands of translators, drivers, cooks, and office assistants to the macoutes of Haiti.

The real horror of the book, which the writers document from personal on-the-ground and eyewitness accounts, is the utter incompetence and corruption of the UN administration…and the willing, blind-eye accommodation of U.S. politicians.

Even before the book was published, the UN took legal action. The organization fired the three writers, threatened them with legal action, complained to American politicians and, in short, did almost everything within its power to make the three writers’ lives miserable. The problem was, Ken Cain writes, “…we were there.” His conclusion? “…capital letters [U.S., UN, NATO, EU] always lie…"
 
We understand venal personalities at high levels because the U.S. is not immune. B. Hussein Obama, for instance, conspires with Bill’s Girl Clinton to hinder the FBI investigations into her finances, her Benghazi lies and uselessness, and her misuse of classified data.

If she becomes president, she will in turn appoint him to the Supreme Court. (I believe he would prefer to preside as Secretary General of the UN. With his ludicrous Nobel Peace Prize, he may achieve this ambition.)

What all of this means to those of us in the shooting and concealed carry community is a giant red flag. It is, after all, the UN Arms Trade Treaty—which Washington Democrats support—that could have police pounding on your door if you own an AR or a high-capacity magazine.

The treaty could force the confiscation of your gun, replacing it with a library-style checkout card good for one day of bird hunting with six shot shells or a trip to the shooting range with a sign-out sheet for 20 rounds of ammo. (The irony, of course, is that crime in the U.S. would skyrocket.)

UN-habituated politicians, internationalists like B. Hussein Obama, want a world without borders, like in the European Union. Such a world would allow the free flow of labor from, for instance, India and China to the U.S.— and corporations would immediately save billions of dollars by firing highly qualified but high-cost Americans or Europeans and hiring low-cost Asians and Africans.

A world without borders would be ruled by unprincipled bullies like Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, who has demanded that the smaller, less powerful nations of the EU accept Muslim refugees…and she gave them quotas.

The ultra-liberal and know-nothing youth wing of international politics is pushing a “world without borders” idea. Expect chapters to open in your town soon, perhaps promoted by the same school teacher who insists that our children learn the fundamentals of the Muslim “religion."

A world without borders would be a quick step into a new Dark Age, an age where the nation-state as we know it breaks down and warlords (or giant corporations) rule. If you are thinking “Mad Max” or “1984” or any of several apocalyptic books and movies, your first step is to buy weapons and ammunition.


The ultra-liberal and know-nothing youth wing of international politics is pushing a “world without borders” idea. Expect chapters to open in your town soon, perhaps promoted by the same school teacher who insists that our children learn the fundamentals of the Muslim “religion.” A world without borders would be a quick step into a new Dark Age, an age where the nation-state as we know it breaks down and warlords (or giant corporations) rule. If you are thinking “Mad Max” or “1984” or any of several apocalyptic books and movies, your first step is to buy weapons and ammunition.A world without borders presided over by Obama and Merkel, Pelosi and Clinton and Kim Jong-un will impose fines for owning a gun; they will proceed to confiscation; they will search your home, threatening prison if they find a weapon.

If we are not vigilant, it can—it will—happen here. Do not believe for one second that we will be “Number One” forever, that we are some untouchable city upon a hill whose light cannot be hidden or that we have an irrevocable charter for freedom and democracy or that the world’s oceans will forever offer protection.

It can happen here. We can lose our nation to—stealing a phrase from Bill’s Girl Clinton—a vast left-wing conspiracy.

Is this conspiracy thinking or simply anticipating that those in power will use it for their own enrichment and celebrity?

“If blue-helmeted UN peacekeepers show up in your town or village and offer to protect you, run. Or else get a weapon.” The UN currently has more than 125,000 troops, police and civilians deployed in 16 operations around the world.


Typically, blue-helmeted UN peacekeepers provide little to the populations they are sent to protect. They rape; they pillage; they bring disease like cholera; they bungle; they turn coward and flee, abandoning or betraying the helpless and hungry, those they have pledged to serve. I expect that before my life is over we will have UN peacekeepers stationed inside the major cities of the U.S., brought here by Obama and Clinton, by Sharpton and Pelosi.


But remember the warning of former UN employees: flee or arm yourself and prepare to fight. Chances are the blue helmets—and, we hope, the World Without Borders celebrities who promote this idiotic concept—will turn tail and run.

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/world-without-borders/?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRoku6jKZKXonjHpfsX67ugoXaeg38431UFwdc jKPmjr1YIJRcd0aPyQ AgobGp5I5FEBSbLYU7Nht6wJXQ%3D%3D